DOJ-OGR-00009413.jpg

366 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 366 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from February 24, 2022, detailing the questioning of a witness named Edelstein. The interrogation focuses on a phone call that occurred on July 15 involving Theresa Trzaskoma and the Court, probing whether Edelstein's firm made an omission that could be considered a lie. The questioning also explores what the firm knew about certain facts prior to receiving a letter.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Edelstein Witness
The individual being questioned throughout the transcript.
Theresa Trzaskoma
Mentioned as a participant in a phone call with the Court on July 15.
Susan Brune
Mentioned in a question asking if she spoke with Theresa Trzaskoma.
MR. OKULA Attorney
Speaks at the end of the questioning to address the judge.
your Honor Judge
Addressed by MR. OKULA, presiding over the proceeding.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.

Timeline (2 events)

2022-02-24
Questioning of witness Edelstein by an unnamed questioner, with attorney Mr. Okula present.
Court
July 15
A phone call with the Court.
Theresa Trzaskoma the Court

Relationships (2)

Questioner Professional (Adversarial) Edelstein
The document is a transcript of a cross-examination where the questioner is probing Edelstein about potential omissions made by his firm.
Edelstein Professional Theresa Trzaskoma
The questioning implies they are colleagues or professionally associated, as the questions concern actions of 'your firm' and communications with Trzaskoma regarding a court matter.

Key Quotes (3)

"Well, would you agree with me that an omission can be construed as a lie?"
Source
— Questioner (Opening question of this excerpt, directed at the witness Edelstein.)
DOJ-OGR-00009413.jpg
Quote #1
"Well, Theresa Trzaskoma participated in the phone call with the Court on July 15, correct?"
Source
— Questioner (A question establishing the facts of a past event for the record.)
DOJ-OGR-00009413.jpg
Quote #2
"I have nothing else, your Honor."
Source
— MR. OKULA (Statement made to the judge, concluding his part in this portion of the proceeding.)
DOJ-OGR-00009413.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,117 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 616-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 124 of 130
A-5809
C2GFDAU3
Edelstein
352
1 Q. Well, would you agree with me that an omission can be
2 construed as a lie?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. And the omissions that your firm made didn't end with
5 filing a brief, would you agree with me?
6 A. No.
7 Q. Well, Theresa Trzaskoma participated in the phone call with
8 the Court on July 15, correct?
9 A. Yes.
10 Q. Are you aware that that phone conversation was going to
11 take place?
12 A. Yes.
13 Q. Did you talk with Theresa Trzaskoma before she participated
14 in that call?
15 A. No.
16 Q. Do you know if Susan Brune did?
17 A. I don't know.
18 Q. Do you know if anybody had a conversation with Theresa
19 Trzaskoma where it was discussed that she would not
20 affirmatively tell the Court about the facts that your firm
21 knew prior to the receipt of the letter?
22 A. No.
23 MR. OKULA: Just one moment, your Honor.
24 (Pause)
25 MR. OKULA: I have nothing else, your Honor.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009413

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document