This document is a court transcript from February 24, 2022, detailing the questioning of a witness named Edelstein. The interrogation focuses on a phone call that occurred on July 15 involving Theresa Trzaskoma and the Court, probing whether Edelstein's firm made an omission that could be considered a lie. The questioning also explores what the firm knew about certain facts prior to receiving a letter.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Edelstein | Witness |
The individual being questioned throughout the transcript.
|
| Theresa Trzaskoma |
Mentioned as a participant in a phone call with the Court on July 15.
|
|
| Susan Brune |
Mentioned in a question asking if she spoke with Theresa Trzaskoma.
|
|
| MR. OKULA | Attorney |
Speaks at the end of the questioning to address the judge.
|
| your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by MR. OKULA, presiding over the proceeding.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
"Well, would you agree with me that an omission can be construed as a lie?"Source
"Well, Theresa Trzaskoma participated in the phone call with the Court on July 15, correct?"Source
"I have nothing else, your Honor."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,117 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document