DOJ-OGR-00011528.jpg
639 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
1
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
4
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
639 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on July 22, 2022, details a judge's decision to overrule objections made by the defendant, Ms. Maxwell. The judge cites trial testimony from witnesses named Annie, Jane, Virginia, and Carolyn as evidence supporting the characterization that Maxwell and Epstein isolated minor girls and developed a multi-level recruitment scheme. The scheme allegedly began with Maxwell recruiting Virginia, who then recruited Carolyn, who in turn recruited others.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein |
Mentioned in connection with Ms. Maxwell's lives, isolating girls, developing a recruitment scheme, and receiving sex...
|
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Referred to as 'Ms. Maxwell' and 'the defendant'. The document discusses her objections to characterizations of her a...
|
| Annie | Witness |
Provided testimony regarding a trip to New Mexico, which was used as evidence of isolating girls.
|
| Jane | Witness |
Provided testimony that she would spend time at the Palm Beach residence alone with Epstein and the defendant.
|
| Virginia | Recruited person/Recruiter |
Mentioned as the starting point of a recruitment scheme, having been recruited by the defendant.
|
| Carolyn | Recruited person/Recruiter |
Mentioned as having been enlisted by Virginia and subsequently recruiting at least three friends.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of a trip mentioned in Annie's testimony as an example of isolating girls.
|
|
|
Location of a residence where Jane testified she would spend time alone with Epstein and the defendant.
|
Relationships (4)
The document states they acted together to isolate minor girls and developed a recruitment scheme.
The document states the scheme started with 'the defendant's recruitment of Virginia.'
The document states 'Carolyn in turn recruited at least three friends.'
Key Quotes (1)
"constant stream of girls who recruited each other."Source
— Unnamed (assertion in a legal document)
(Part of an assertion, to which the defendant objected, that she and Epstein developed a scheme with this characteristic.)
DOJ-OGR-00011528.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,929 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 9 of 101 9
M6SQmaxl
M6SQmaxl
1 to be blind, deaf and dumb, and to say nothing of Epstein's and
2 Ms. Maxwell's lives.
3 Paragraph 26, there's an objection to the
4 characterization concerning the defendant's identification and
5 isolation of minor girls as inconsistent with the trial
6 evidence. I overrule this objection for the same reasons as
7 articulated with respect to paragraph 22. In addition, the
8 trial evidence established that the defendant and Epstein
9 isolated girls by spending time with them alone away from their
10 families. For example, Annie's testimony regarding the trip to
11 New Mexico. Jane's testimony that she would spend time at the
12 Palm Beach residence alone with Epstein and the defendant.
13 Paragraphs 27 and 28 the defendant makes two
14 objections: First, to the assertion that the defendant and
15 Epstein developed a scheme that created a "constant stream of
16 girls who recruited each other." And, second, she objects to
17 the assertion that she encouraged minor girls to bring other
18 minor girls to provide Epstein with sexualized massages.
19 Again, based on the trial testimony and evidence, I
20 overrule the objection. It supported the information in these
21 paragraphs. The evidence indicated the scheme started with the
22 defendant's recruitment of Virginia. Virginia then enlisted
23 Carolyn in addition to at least two other girls. Carolyn in
24 turn recruited at least three friends, and those friends then
25 brought more girls.
2 Ms. Maxwell's lives.
3 Paragraph 26, there's an objection to the
4 characterization concerning the defendant's identification and
5 isolation of minor girls as inconsistent with the trial
6 evidence. I overrule this objection for the same reasons as
7 articulated with respect to paragraph 22. In addition, the
8 trial evidence established that the defendant and Epstein
9 isolated girls by spending time with them alone away from their
10 families. For example, Annie's testimony regarding the trip to
11 New Mexico. Jane's testimony that she would spend time at the
12 Palm Beach residence alone with Epstein and the defendant.
13 Paragraphs 27 and 28 the defendant makes two
14 objections: First, to the assertion that the defendant and
15 Epstein developed a scheme that created a "constant stream of
16 girls who recruited each other." And, second, she objects to
17 the assertion that she encouraged minor girls to bring other
18 minor girls to provide Epstein with sexualized massages.
19 Again, based on the trial testimony and evidence, I
20 overrule the objection. It supported the information in these
21 paragraphs. The evidence indicated the scheme started with the
22 defendant's recruitment of Virginia. Virginia then enlisted
23 Carolyn in addition to at least two other girls. Carolyn in
24 turn recruited at least three friends, and those friends then
25 brought more girls.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
*
*
*
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011528
*
*
*
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011528
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document