This document is a transcript page from a House Oversight collection featuring an interview between Harnwell and Steve Bannon. The conversation focuses on the 2014 primary defeat of House Majority Leader Eric Cantor by a Tea Party candidate. Bannon highlights the financial disparity in the election, noting Cantor spent $8 million compared to his opponent's $175,000, specifically criticizing Cantor's campaign for spending over $200,000 at a Washington D.C. steakhouse.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Harnwell | Interviewer |
Asking questions about American domestic politics and conservative media.
|
| Steve Bannon | Interviewee |
Identified as 'Bannon', discussing the political landscape and Eric Cantor's defeat.
|
| Eric Cantor | Subject of discussion |
Former House Majority Leader mentioned as having lost a primary election.
|
| Kirk Irwin | Photographer |
Credited for the image in the document header.
|
| Dave Brat | Subject of discussion (implied) |
Referenced as the 'professor who was an evangelical Christian and a libertarian economist' who defeated Cantor.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Getty Images |
Image source credit.
|
|
| Tea Party |
Political movement mentioned in relation to the candidate who defeated Cantor.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Region described as undergoing a 'substantial sea change'.
|
|
|
Location of the 'elite steak house' where campaign funds were spent.
|
|
|
Geopolitical term used by Harnwell to describe the audience.
|
"The third-largest conservative news website is something to be extremely impressed by."Source
"Eric Cantor, was deselected a couple of weeks ago by a tea party candidate."Source
"it’s the biggest election upset in the history of the American republic."Source
"So they spent more than $200,000 over the course of the campaign wining and dining fat cats at a steak house in Washington than the entire opposition had to run."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,296 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document