This document is page 248 of a scientific paper or book chapter, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. It discusses theoretical biology, specifically the application of 'random walk theory' versus 'determinism' in neurosciences and dynamical systems. It cites various researchers (Mandell, Selz, Shlesinger, etc.) and argues that distinguishing between randomness and determinism may be unproductive given the maturity of random walk models.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Manning | Author/Researcher |
Cited in text (1981) regarding topological entropy.
|
| Mandell | Author/Researcher |
Cited in text (1995, 1997a) regarding neuroendocrine and behavioral systems. Likely Arnold Mandell, a scientist assoc...
|
| Selz | Author/Researcher |
Co-author cited with Mandell (1995, 1997a).
|
| Smotherman | Author/Researcher |
Cited in text (1996).
|
| Shlesinger | Author/Researcher |
Cited in text (1982, 1984) regarding random walk models.
|
| Montroll | Author/Researcher |
Co-author cited with Shlesinger (1984).
|
| Hughes | Author/Researcher |
Cited in text (1995).
|
| Klafter | Author/Researcher |
Cited in text (1996).
|
| Parry | Author/Researcher |
Cited in text (1964).
|
| Adler | Author/Researcher |
Co-author cited with Weiss (1967).
|
| Weiss | Author/Researcher |
Co-author cited with Adler (1967).
|
| Bowen | Author/Researcher |
Cited in text (1970).
|
| Lasota | Author/Researcher |
Co-author cited with Yorke (1973).
|
| Yorke | Author/Researcher |
Co-author cited with Lasota (1973).
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013748'.
|
"Is Randomness Versus Determinism a Productive Question for the Biological Sciences? Are There Better Ones?"Source
"It is important to note that random walk theory and computation has matured to such an extent that almost any “nonlinear dynamical behavior” can, with respect to statistical measure, be modeled using one of many varieties."Source
"making what may be more a metaphysical discrimination at this point is labor intensive, contentious and unproductive for generating new experimental work in the neurosciences."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,189 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document