HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013748.jpg

1.83 MB

Extraction Summary

14
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Academic/scientific paper (page from)
File Size: 1.83 MB
Summary

This document is page 248 of a scientific paper or book chapter, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. It discusses theoretical biology, specifically the application of 'random walk theory' versus 'determinism' in neurosciences and dynamical systems. It cites various researchers (Mandell, Selz, Shlesinger, etc.) and argues that distinguishing between randomness and determinism may be unproductive given the maturity of random walk models.

People (14)

Name Role Context
Manning Author/Researcher
Cited in text (1981) regarding topological entropy.
Mandell Author/Researcher
Cited in text (1995, 1997a) regarding neuroendocrine and behavioral systems. Likely Arnold Mandell, a scientist assoc...
Selz Author/Researcher
Co-author cited with Mandell (1995, 1997a).
Smotherman Author/Researcher
Cited in text (1996).
Shlesinger Author/Researcher
Cited in text (1982, 1984) regarding random walk models.
Montroll Author/Researcher
Co-author cited with Shlesinger (1984).
Hughes Author/Researcher
Cited in text (1995).
Klafter Author/Researcher
Cited in text (1996).
Parry Author/Researcher
Cited in text (1964).
Adler Author/Researcher
Co-author cited with Weiss (1967).
Weiss Author/Researcher
Co-author cited with Adler (1967).
Bowen Author/Researcher
Cited in text (1970).
Lasota Author/Researcher
Co-author cited with Yorke (1973).
Yorke Author/Researcher
Co-author cited with Lasota (1973).

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013748'.

Relationships (4)

Mandell Co-authors/Colleagues Selz
Citations: (Mandell and Selz, 1995; Mandell and Selz, 1997a)
Montroll Co-authors/Colleagues Shlesinger
Citation: (Montroll and Shlesinger, 1984)
Adler Co-authors/Colleagues Weiss
Citation: (Adler and Weiss, 1967)
Lasota Co-authors/Colleagues Yorke
Citation: (Lasota and Yorke, 1973)

Key Quotes (3)

"Is Randomness Versus Determinism a Productive Question for the Biological Sciences? Are There Better Ones?"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013748.jpg
Quote #1
"It is important to note that random walk theory and computation has matured to such an extent that almost any “nonlinear dynamical behavior” can, with respect to statistical measure, be modeled using one of many varieties."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013748.jpg
Quote #2
"making what may be more a metaphysical discrimination at this point is labor intensive, contentious and unproductive for generating new experimental work in the neurosciences."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013748.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,189 characters)

idealized systems, topological entropy has been proven be equivalent to the product
of an index of expansion and the dimension of the support such that an increase in
expansiveness , λ(+), is compensated by a decrease in Do leaving hT invariant
(Manning, 1981). This relationship has also been found in the behavior of some
nonuniformly expansive neuroendocrine, neuronal and human behavioral systems
(Mandell and Selz, 1995; Smotherman et al, 1996; Mandell and Selz, 1997a;).
Is Randomness Versus Determinism a Productive Question for the Biological
Sciences? Are There Better Ones?
Measures made on realistically nonuniformly expansive behavior of
dynamical systems emerging from nonlinear differential equations and that arising
from a variety of non-classical random walk models overlap such that making what
may be more a metaphysical discrimination at this point is labor intensive,
contentious and unproductive for generating new experimental work in the
neurosciences. It is important to note that random walk theory and computation has
matured to such an extent that almost any “nonlinear dynamical behavior” can, with
respect to statistical measure, be modeled using one of many varieties. For
examples, power law distributions in continuous time random walks (times of
movement are also randomly chosen) , random walks with traps (temporarily
immobilizing the trajectory like unstable fixed points), random walks in random
environments, time of passage of ants in a labyrinth and Levy leaps and local
diffusive exploration (looking for a wallet) among many others can represent much
of the irregular behavior we observe in the brain (Shlesinger et al, 1982; Montroll
and Shlesinger, 1984; Hughes, 1995; Klafter et al, 1996). On the other hand,
(Markoff) partition of the sequence and a probabilistic style of analysis of nonlinear
dynamical systems has been a major strategy for description and quantification
from the field’s beginnings (Parry, 1964; Adler and Weiss, 1967; Bowen, 1970;
Lasota and Yorke, 1973). The issue of randomness versus determinism remains
current although many if not most properties of deterministic dynamical systems can
248
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013748

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document