HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013359.jpg

1.38 MB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing / court document (summary of deposition testimony)
File Size: 1.38 MB
Summary

This document is a page from a legal filing summarizing specific instances during a deposition where Jeffrey Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment rights. Paragraphs 113 through 120 detail his refusal to answer questions regarding the procurement of minors for prostitution, sexual acts with underage females, his personal sexual preferences, the identity of those paying his legal fees, and the veracity of a complaint filed by a victim identified as L.M. in September 2008.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Deponent/Defendant
Refusing to answer questions regarding sexual abuse of minors and financial matters by invoking the Fifth Amendment.
L.M. Plaintiff/Victim
Individual who filed a complaint against Epstein in September 2008.
Palm Beach billionaire Subject of query
Refers to Epstein himself in a quoted text regarding a complaint.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
RRA
Mentioned in paragraph 118 as part of a 'litigation team' accused of trying to turn the case into a goldmine.
House Oversight Committee
Source of the document (indicated by footer stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT).

Timeline (2 events)

September 2008
Filing of a complaint by L.M. against Jeffrey Epstein.
Unknown
Unknown (Date of Deposition)
Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein where he repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment.
Unknown
Jeffrey Epstein Interrogator

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location associated with the 'billionaire' (Epstein) mentioned in paragraph 118.

Relationships (2)

Jeffrey Epstein Legal Adversary L.M.
Paragraph 120 mentions L.M.'s complaint filed against Epstein.
Jeffrey Epstein Legal Adversary RRA
Paragraph 118 discusses a complaint alleging RRA sought to turn the facts into a 'goldmine'.

Key Quotes (3)

"In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: 'How many minors have you procured for prostitution?'"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013359.jpg
Quote #1
"In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: 'Do you have a personal sexual preference for children?'"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013359.jpg
Quote #2
"In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: 'Who are the people who are authorized to make payment [to your lawyers] on your behalf?'"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013359.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,661 characters)

113. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “How many minors have you procured for prostitution?” Id. at 104.
114. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “Have you ever coerced, induced or enticed any minor to engage in any sexual act with you?” Id. at 107.
115. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “How many times have you engaged in fondling underage females?” Id. at 108.
116. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “How many times have you engaged in oral sex with females under the age of 18?” Id. at 110.
117. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “Do you have a personal sexual preference for children?” Id. at 111-12.
118. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “Your Complaint at page 27, paragraph 49, says that ‘RRA and the litigation team took an emotionally driven set of facts involving alleged innocent, unsuspecting, underage females and a Palm Beach billionaire, and sought to turn it into a goldmine,’ end of quote. Who is the Palm Beach billionaire referred to in that sentence?” Id. at 112-13.
119. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “Who are the people who are authorized to make payment [to your lawyers] on your behalf?” Id. at 120.
120. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “Is there anything in L.M.’s Complaint that was filed against you in September of 2008 which you contend to be false?” Id. at 128.
41
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013359

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document