DOJ-OGR-00010058.jpg
415 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
415 KB
Summary
This document is page 318 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cv-00438-DAO) filed on August 24, 2022. It features testimony from Ms. Brune under redirect examination by Ms. Davis, discussing legal ethics regarding whether an attorney should raise non-meritorious arguments if the government omits them. Ms. Brune asserts she would disclose facts or arguments if put in issue by the Court or government.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Brune | Witness / Attorney |
Under recross and redirect examination; discussing legal ethics and disclosure.
|
| Ms. Davis | Attorney |
Conducting redirect examination of Ms. Brune.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings.
|
| Mr. Schectman | Attorney |
Mentioned by the Court as a potential questioner.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
|
|
| The Government |
Referenced by witness regarding legal arguments and issues raised.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on court reporter name (likely SDNY).
|
Key Quotes (3)
"But if nobody ever raised it, I don't think that I would have even been acting ethically if I said on behalf of my client, hey, here's an argument I don't even think is meritorious but the government has omitted to raise it so I on the defense side will raise it."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010058.jpg
Quote #1
"If it was put in issue by the Court or by the government, I would have done and in fact did do what I did."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010058.jpg
Quote #2
"What I'm trying to say is, I would have laid it out, which is what I did."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010058.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,297 characters)
Case 1:20-cv-00438-DAO Document 64-22 Filed 08/24/22 Page 9 of 30
A-5775
A-5775
318
C2GFDAU3 Brune - recross
1 thinking about, well, what will happen if nobody ever raises
2 it. But if nobody ever raised it, I don't think that I would
3 have even been acting ethically if I said on behalf of my
4 client, hey, here's an argument I don't even think is
5 meritorious but the government has omitted to raise it so I on
6 the defense side will raise it.
7 THE COURT: All right. Any further inquiries?
8 Ms. Davis or Mr. Schectman?
9 MS. DAVIS: Can I have one brief followup on that,
10 your Honor?
11 THE COURT: Yes.
12 MS. DAVIS: Can I just do it from right here?
13 THE COURT: Yes.
14 REDIRECT EXAMINATION
15 BY MS. DAVIS:
16 Q. Are you talking about facts or argument, Ms. Brune, when
17 you say you wouldn't have -- are you saying you would not have
18 disclosed the underlying facts or wouldn't have made the legal
19 argument?
20 A. If it was put in issue by the Court or by the government, I
21 would have done and in fact did do what I did. It's a little
22 tangled up. What I'm trying to say is, I would have laid it
23 out, which is what I did.
24 Q. The facts, though?
25 A. Well, I also try to lay out the applicable law. I'm not
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010058
C2GFDAU3 Brune - recross
1 thinking about, well, what will happen if nobody ever raises
2 it. But if nobody ever raised it, I don't think that I would
3 have even been acting ethically if I said on behalf of my
4 client, hey, here's an argument I don't even think is
5 meritorious but the government has omitted to raise it so I on
6 the defense side will raise it.
7 THE COURT: All right. Any further inquiries?
8 Ms. Davis or Mr. Schectman?
9 MS. DAVIS: Can I have one brief followup on that,
10 your Honor?
11 THE COURT: Yes.
12 MS. DAVIS: Can I just do it from right here?
13 THE COURT: Yes.
14 REDIRECT EXAMINATION
15 BY MS. DAVIS:
16 Q. Are you talking about facts or argument, Ms. Brune, when
17 you say you wouldn't have -- are you saying you would not have
18 disclosed the underlying facts or wouldn't have made the legal
19 argument?
20 A. If it was put in issue by the Court or by the government, I
21 would have done and in fact did do what I did. It's a little
22 tangled up. What I'm trying to say is, I would have laid it
23 out, which is what I did.
24 Q. The facts, though?
25 A. Well, I also try to lay out the applicable law. I'm not
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010058
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document