This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) filed on February 10, 2020. Defense attorney Mr. Foy argues that the trial should consider the broader 'culture of the institution' and security failures at the MCC, rather than just the specific '14-hour period' alleged by the government. Foy highlights a discovery dispute, noting that of 192 existing videos, only three were provided, and of nine cameras in the SHU, only one was produced which 'shows almost nothing.' The Court orders the trial to begin on June 8.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Foy | Defense Attorney |
Arguing regarding the scope of the trial, discovery issues regarding video evidence, and scheduling conflicts.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing; sets the trial date for June 8th.
|
| The Government | Prosecution |
Represented as claiming the case is strictly about a '14-hour period'.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MCC |
Metropolitan Correctional Center; cited regarding poor working conditions, culture, and security failures.
|
|
| SHU |
Special Housing Unit (within the MCC); specific location where video cameras were discussed.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Transcription service.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
"We have been provided with three videos of the 192 that exist."Source
"In the SHU there are nine video cameras. Only one has been produced, and it shows almost nothing."Source
"the working conditions at MCC are directly related to why things happened in that 14-hour period."Source
"The years of conduct, the culture of the institution, the failures in security measures beyond counts."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,552 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document