DOJ-OGR-00013271.jpg
585 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
585 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between attorneys and a judge about scheduling witnesses for an upcoming hearing. The primary issue raised is a request by attorney Ms. Menninger for the court to order a witness named Jane and her attorney not to discuss her testimony with another subpoenaed witness, who is Jane's younger sibling. The judge also proposes several dates for the hearing to avoid interfering with jury time.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MENNINGER | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, discussing witness logistics and making a request regarding witness communication.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the court transcript, presiding over the hearing and discussing scheduling.
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, requesting to confer with the government.
|
| Ms. Maxwell |
Mentioned by the court as being able to be present for a future hearing.
|
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, thanking the judge.
|
| Jane | Witness |
Mentioned by Ms. Menninger as a witness who has a younger sibling also under subpoena.
|
| Jane's younger sibling | Witness |
Mentioned by Ms. Menninger as a witness under subpoena.
|
| Jane's attorney | Attorney |
Mentioned by Ms. Menninger in the context of communications with Jane and another witness.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the government | government agency |
Mentioned by Mr. Everdell as a party to confer with regarding options.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript, likely the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2022-08-10
A court hearing where attorneys and the judge discuss scheduling and witness logistics.
courtroom
A younger sibling of Jane is under subpoena to be a witness.
The court suggests potential dates for a future hearing: the evening of the 16th or 17th, or Saturday the 18th.
courtroom
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned by the court as a location for public access to a hearing.
|
|
|
Mentioned by the court as a location for public access to a hearing.
|
Relationships (2)
The document explicitly states one is the 'younger sibling of Jane'.
The document refers to 'communications with Jane and her attorney'.
Key Quotes (2)
"I would like to point out that we do have a younger sibling of Jane under our subpoena and I would ask, because we don't have communications with that witness, that when there are communications with Jane and her attorney, that she be directed not to communicate about her testimony with that witness..."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Making a request to the court to prevent potential witness tampering or collusion between two related witnesses.)
DOJ-OGR-00013271.jpg
Quote #1
"I wanted to make that available so that we're not -- so we have time for it that isn't intruding into the time of the jury next week. So I think in light of what you're indicating, my thinking would be either the evening of the 16th or 17th, or Saturday the 18th."Source
— THE COURT
(Discussing scheduling options for a future hearing to avoid conflicting with the jury's time.)
DOJ-OGR-00013271.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,490 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 258 of 264 1699
LC7Cmax8
LC7Cmax8
1 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, we do have witnesses, so
2 we're going to have to sort through some logistics ourselves.
3 THE COURT: I understand that.
4 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think maybe if we have
5 the opportunity to confer with the government, we can report
6 tomorrow on the options.
7 THE COURT: That's fine. I wanted to make that
8 available so that we're not -- so we have time for it that
9 isn't intruding into the time of the jury next week. So I
10 think in light of what you're indicating, my thinking would be
11 either the evening of the 16th or 17th, or Saturday the 18th.
12 Again, I have inquired and there is no issue,
13 Ms. Maxwell can be here and we can have public access both in
14 the courtroom and overflow room. So you'll confer and let me
15 know your thinking as to timing.
16 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.
17 THE COURT: Other matters to take up?
18 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, on that point, I would
19 like to point out that we do have a younger sibling of Jane
20 under our subpoena and I would ask, because we don't have
21 communications with that witness, that when there are
22 communications with Jane and her attorney, that she be directed
23 not to communicate about her testimony with that witness in
24 light of issues that I think are apparent that I can certainly
25 make a record if need be.
2 we're going to have to sort through some logistics ourselves.
3 THE COURT: I understand that.
4 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think maybe if we have
5 the opportunity to confer with the government, we can report
6 tomorrow on the options.
7 THE COURT: That's fine. I wanted to make that
8 available so that we're not -- so we have time for it that
9 isn't intruding into the time of the jury next week. So I
10 think in light of what you're indicating, my thinking would be
11 either the evening of the 16th or 17th, or Saturday the 18th.
12 Again, I have inquired and there is no issue,
13 Ms. Maxwell can be here and we can have public access both in
14 the courtroom and overflow room. So you'll confer and let me
15 know your thinking as to timing.
16 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.
17 THE COURT: Other matters to take up?
18 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, on that point, I would
19 like to point out that we do have a younger sibling of Jane
20 under our subpoena and I would ask, because we don't have
21 communications with that witness, that when there are
22 communications with Jane and her attorney, that she be directed
23 not to communicate about her testimony with that witness in
24 light of issues that I think are apparent that I can certainly
25 make a record if need be.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013271
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document