DOJ-OGR-00002985.jpg

704 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
0
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 704 KB
Summary

This legal document is a court filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated April 16, 2021. It outlines the statutory background regarding the statute of limitations for crimes against minors, arguing against a motion by the defendant, Maxwell. The document traces the history of relevant legislation, including the Crime Control Act of 1990, to counter Maxwell's claim that the charges against her do not involve the sexual or physical abuse of a child, and urges the court to deny her motion.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Maxwell Defendant
Mentioned as arguing that Section 3283 is inapplicable to the offenses charged against her.
David McCord Author
Cited as the author of 'Expert Psychological Testimony About Child Complainants in Sexual Abuse Prosecutions'.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Congress government agency
Mentioned as having passed a series of laws between 1990 and 2006 to expand the statute of limitations for crimes aga...
This Court government agency
Referred to as the body that should deny Maxwell's motion.

Timeline (3 events)

1990
Congress enacted a new statute of limitation for certain crimes against children via the Crime Control Act of 1990.
1990-2006
Congress passed a series of laws that expanded the statute of limitations for prosecutions of crimes against minors.
1994
Congress re-codified a provision from the Crime Control Act of 1990, moving it to 18 U.S.C. § 3283.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in the case name 'Weingarten v. United States'.

Key Quotes (2)

"involv[e] the sexual or physical abuse . . . of a child."
Source
— Maxwell (Quoted from Maxwell's argument that the offenses charged against her do not meet this criteria, making Section 3283 inapplicable.)
DOJ-OGR-00002985.jpg
Quote #1
"No statute of limitation that would otherwise preclude prosecution for an offense involving the sexual or physical abuse of a child under the age of 18 years shall preclude such a prosecution before the child reaches the age of 25 years."
Source
— Crime Control Act of 1990 (The text of a new statute of limitation enacted by Congress in 1990.)
DOJ-OGR-00002985.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,088 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 Filed 04/16/21 Page 51 of 239
In the alternative, Maxwell argues that Section 3283 is inapplicable because the offenses charged in the Indictment do not “involv[e] the sexual or physical abuse . . . of a child.” (Def. Mot. 2 at 12-14). Yet her argument runs contrary to the weight of authority that has adopted the common-sense view that crimes that necessarily entail the sexual or physical abuse of children “involv[e] the sexual or physical abuse of a child.” This Court should do the same and deny the motion.
A. Statutory Background
Between 1990 and 2006, Congress passed a series of laws that expanded the statute of limitations for prosecutions of crimes against minors, ultimately extending the statute of limitations to the lifetime of the minor victim and, for certain offenses, eliminating the statute of limitations entirely. These laws reflect a virtually unbroken congressional policy that the default five-year statute of limitations for federal crimes, 18 U.S.C. § 3282, is inadequate for such offenses. An extended statute of limitations is necessary because “child sex abuse offenses . . . may be difficult to detect quickly,” in part because children often first report their abuse long after it occurs. Weingarten v. United States, 865 F.3d 48, 54 (2d Cir. 2017) (citing, e.g., David McCord, Expert Psychological Testimony About Child Complainants in Sexual Abuse Prosecutions, 77 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1, 60-61 (1986)).
In 1990, Congress enacted a new statute of limitation for certain crimes against children, which stated: “No statute of limitation that would otherwise preclude prosecution for an offense involving the sexual or physical abuse of a child under the age of 18 years shall preclude such a prosecution before the child reaches the age of 25 years.” Crime Control Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-647, tit. II, § 225(a), 104 Stat. 4789, 4798 (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) (1990)). In 1994, Congress re-codified this provision, moving it to 18 U.S.C. § 3283 with identical language.
24
DOJ-OGR-00002985

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document