This legal document is a court filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated April 16, 2021. It outlines the statutory background regarding the statute of limitations for crimes against minors, arguing against a motion by the defendant, Maxwell. The document traces the history of relevant legislation, including the Crime Control Act of 1990, to counter Maxwell's claim that the charges against her do not involve the sexual or physical abuse of a child, and urges the court to deny her motion.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned as arguing that Section 3283 is inapplicable to the offenses charged against her.
|
| David McCord | Author |
Cited as the author of 'Expert Psychological Testimony About Child Complainants in Sexual Abuse Prosecutions'.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Congress | government agency |
Mentioned as having passed a series of laws between 1990 and 2006 to expand the statute of limitations for crimes aga...
|
| This Court | government agency |
Referred to as the body that should deny Maxwell's motion.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the case name 'Weingarten v. United States'.
|
"involv[e] the sexual or physical abuse . . . of a child."Source
"No statute of limitation that would otherwise preclude prosecution for an offense involving the sexual or physical abuse of a child under the age of 18 years shall preclude such a prosecution before the child reaches the age of 25 years."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,088 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document