DOJ-OGR-00013004.jpg
585 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
585 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It details a legal argument between the defense, the prosecution (Ms. Moe), and the judge over the admissibility of a photograph. The key points of contention are the photo's metadata, whether the person depicted was a minor at the time, and the defense's accusation that the prosecution's actions constitute 'slut shaming'.
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned as a party in the legal proceedings, represented by Ms. Moe.
|
| defense | legal team |
Mentioned as a party in the legal proceedings, opposing the government.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Relationships (1)
The document shows them as opposing counsel in a legal case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), arguing before a judge about the admissibility of evidence. The relationship is adversarial.
Key Quotes (4)
"the government called us, I think it was slut shaming when I tried to argue that there were other photographs of this individual that were much like this that she had put out in newspapers"Source
— Unnamed speaker (likely defense counsel)
(Arguing against the admission of a photograph of a witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00013004.jpg
Quote #1
"Is the government's representation that the individual depicted in this photo is a minor at the time of the photo?"Source
— THE COURT
(Questioning the government's position on a piece of photographic evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00013004.jpg
Quote #2
"Your Honor, we made no representations about the metadata of the file of this photo."Source
— MS. MOE
(Responding to the court's question about the age of the person in the photograph.)
DOJ-OGR-00013004.jpg
Quote #3
"There will be testimony at this trial and there has been testimony at this trial that this person was victimized as a minor."Source
— MS. MOE
(Providing context about the witness's status without directly dating the photograph.)
DOJ-OGR-00013004.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,466 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 253 of 261 1414
LC6Cmax7 Meder - direct
LC6Cmax7 Meder - direct
1 exists.
2 And I also would like to say with respect to 309, we
3 litigated whether or not we could put in evidence photographs
4 of this witness, and the government called us, I think it was
5 slut shaming when I tried to argue that there were other
6 photographs of this individual that were much like this that
7 she had put out in newspapers, and now they want to put on a
8 photo of her after she's gotten off the stand and not afforded
9 us the opportunity to cross examine her about similar
10 photographs that she has put out.
11 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I'm surprised by all three of
12 those arguments.
13 THE COURT: Let's start with 332. Is the government's
14 representation that the individual depicted in this photo is a
15 minor at the time of the photo?
16 MS. MOE: Your Honor, we made no representations about
17 the metadata of the file of this photo. To be short, in
18 direct, I don't know. There will be testimony at this trial
19 and there has been testimony at this trial that this person was
20 victimized as a minor.
21 In terms of the particular date of this photograph,
22 we're limited by the information we have in the metadata. I
23 believe it's for this reason that the defense had noticed
24 perhaps a metadata expert and the defense will be free to
25 explore that issue.
2 And I also would like to say with respect to 309, we
3 litigated whether or not we could put in evidence photographs
4 of this witness, and the government called us, I think it was
5 slut shaming when I tried to argue that there were other
6 photographs of this individual that were much like this that
7 she had put out in newspapers, and now they want to put on a
8 photo of her after she's gotten off the stand and not afforded
9 us the opportunity to cross examine her about similar
10 photographs that she has put out.
11 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I'm surprised by all three of
12 those arguments.
13 THE COURT: Let's start with 332. Is the government's
14 representation that the individual depicted in this photo is a
15 minor at the time of the photo?
16 MS. MOE: Your Honor, we made no representations about
17 the metadata of the file of this photo. To be short, in
18 direct, I don't know. There will be testimony at this trial
19 and there has been testimony at this trial that this person was
20 victimized as a minor.
21 In terms of the particular date of this photograph,
22 we're limited by the information we have in the metadata. I
23 believe it's for this reason that the defense had noticed
24 perhaps a metadata expert and the defense will be free to
25 explore that issue.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013004
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document