This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge. They are discussing the admissibility of specific questions (16 and 17) to be asked during a cross-examination, which concern visits to Mr. Epstein's home and any financial compensation received. The judge sustains an objection but ultimately indicates a willingness to allow the questions for a person identified as Ms. Comey.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn |
Mentioned in the header next to 'cross', likely indicating she is the subject of a cross-examination.
|
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in the transcript, presiding over the legal proceeding, making rulings on objections.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, addressing the court and referencing questions from a document.
|
| Mr. Epstein |
Mentioned as the owner of a home that is the subject of question 16.
|
|
| Ms. Comey |
Mentioned by the Court, who is considering allowing a question to be posed to her.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location mentioned in question 16, which asks how a person came to be there.
|
"State in detail how you came to be at Mr. Epstein's home on each occasion, i.e., did someone bring you or ask you if you would or wanted to go. If so, state the name and address of that individual and what he/she told you and the purpose of your visit."Source
"Objection. Compound. Sustained."Source
"So I will allow -- Ms. Comey, unless you want to be heard, my inclination is to allow the question and answer in 16 in."Source
"The amount of monies or anything of value you"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,262 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document