DOJ-OGR-00008913.jpg
739 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order / legal filing
File Size:
739 KB
Summary
This document is Page 5 of a Court Order filed on February 11, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Court outlines schedules for docketing redacted filings and explicitly denies a motion by 'Juror 50' to intervene in the case regarding a post-verdict inquiry into alleged false voir dire responses. The document also references a motion by the New York Times Company to unseal juror questionnaires.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror 50 | Juror / Movant |
Subject of a motion to intervene regarding a post-verdict inquiry into allegedly false voir dire responses; motion de...
|
| Defendant | Defendant |
Party ordered to docket exhibits; opposes Juror 50's motion. (Implies Ghislaine Maxwell based on case number).
|
| The Court | Judge/Judiciary |
Issues the order denying intervention and managing redactions.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government |
Prosecution; opposes Juror 50's motion.
|
|
| New York Times Company |
Filed a motion to unseal filled-out questionnaires for the twelve seated jurors.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated in Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Relationships (2)
Court denies Juror 50's motion to intervene in post-verdict inquiry.
NYT motion to unseal questionnaires includes Juror 50's questionnaire.
Key Quotes (4)
"The Court denies the motion."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008913.jpg
Quote #1
"Juror 50 cites no authority to support a juror’s intervention when he will possibly be subject to a post-verdict inquiry."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008913.jpg
Quote #2
"Although cases do support that a juror should have legal counsel in a post-verdict inquiry into allegedly false voir dire responses, as Juror 50 does have, no cases support intervention."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008913.jpg
Quote #3
"Exhibit 1 to the Defendant’s motion, which is Juror 50’s completed questionnaire, is to be maintained temporarily under seal..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008913.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,297 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 596 Filed 02/11/22 Page 5 of 7
Order, via email on or before February 16, 2022. Because this Order resolves the scope of
redactions for all filings related to the motion, the Court adjourns sine die the briefing schedule
previously set for the parties to justify any proposed sealing or redactions to the new trial motion
papers. See Dkt. No. 585. The Court will rule on the proposed redactions so the filings can be
docketed, and the Court will file under seal unredacted copies of any documents for which
redactions are approved.
redactions for all filings related to the motion, the Court adjourns sine die the briefing schedule
previously set for the parties to justify any proposed sealing or redactions to the new trial motion
papers. See Dkt. No. 585. The Court will rule on the proposed redactions so the filings can be
docketed, and the Court will file under seal unredacted copies of any documents for which
redactions are approved.
At the time the briefs are docketed with approved redactions, the Defendant is further
ORDERED to docket Exhibits 2 and 3 to her motion and the exhibit to her reply, and the
Government ORDERED to docket all exhibits to its opposition, all of which are publicly
available documents.¹
ORDERED to docket Exhibits 2 and 3 to her motion and the exhibit to her reply, and the
Government ORDERED to docket all exhibits to its opposition, all of which are publicly
available documents.¹
II. Juror 50 Motion to Intervene
The Court is also in receipt of Juror 50’s motion to intervene, which both the Government
and the Defense oppose. Defense Motion, at 51-52; Government Response, at 44; see also
Defense Ltr., Jan. 13, 2022. The Court denies the motion. Juror 50 cites no authority to support
a juror’s intervention when he will possibly be subject to a post-verdict inquiry. The cases he
cites in support are inapposite; he is not seeking to intervene to assert First Amendment access
by the press, to quash a subpoena, or to prevent dissemination of privileged information.
Although cases do support that a juror should have legal counsel in a post-verdict inquiry into
allegedly false voir dire responses, as Juror 50 does have, no cases support intervention. See,
e.g., McCoy, No. 14 Cr. 6181 (EAW), Dkt. No. 329 at 6-7 (appointing counsel for juror alleged
and the Defense oppose. Defense Motion, at 51-52; Government Response, at 44; see also
Defense Ltr., Jan. 13, 2022. The Court denies the motion. Juror 50 cites no authority to support
a juror’s intervention when he will possibly be subject to a post-verdict inquiry. The cases he
cites in support are inapposite; he is not seeking to intervene to assert First Amendment access
by the press, to quash a subpoena, or to prevent dissemination of privileged information.
Although cases do support that a juror should have legal counsel in a post-verdict inquiry into
allegedly false voir dire responses, as Juror 50 does have, no cases support intervention. See,
e.g., McCoy, No. 14 Cr. 6181 (EAW), Dkt. No. 329 at 6-7 (appointing counsel for juror alleged
_____________________
¹ Exhibit 1 to the Defendant’s motion, which is Juror 50’s completed questionnaire, is to be maintained temporarily
under seal pending the Court’s ruling on whether a hearing will be held and on the New York Times Company’s
motion to unseal the filled-out questionnaires for the twelve seated jurors. Dkt. Nos. 583, 585. The Court will
address Juror 50’s request that a copy of his questionnaire be released to his counsel at that time. The Court notes
that the voir dire transcript is currently available to the public.
¹ Exhibit 1 to the Defendant’s motion, which is Juror 50’s completed questionnaire, is to be maintained temporarily
under seal pending the Court’s ruling on whether a hearing will be held and on the New York Times Company’s
motion to unseal the filled-out questionnaires for the twelve seated jurors. Dkt. Nos. 583, 585. The Court will
address Juror 50’s request that a copy of his questionnaire be released to his counsel at that time. The Court notes
that the voir dire transcript is currently available to the public.
5
DOJ-OGR-00008913
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document