This legal document, dated December 5, 2021, is a filing to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing against the admissibility of interior photographs of Mr. Epstein's apartment. The author contends the photos, taken in 2019, cannot be proven to accurately represent the apartment's state during the charged conspiracy, which ended in 2004. The document highlights that the government's case for the photos' relevance relies solely on the testimony of a witness, "Jane," who described the apartment's interior based on her memory from an alleged visit in the mid-1990s.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Honorable Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
The document is addressed to her.
|
| Mr. Epstein | Accused |
Owner of the New York apartment where an alleged assault took place.
|
| Jane | Accuser/Witness |
Alleges she was assaulted by Mr. Epstein in his apartment; her testimony about the apartment's interior is quoted.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Party to the case |
Mentioned in a footnote as not objecting to exterior photographs, implying she is a defendant or related party.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned as a party in the legal case, seeking to use photos as evidence.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The central location discussed, where an alleged assault occurred and whose interior is described.
|
|
|
The city where Mr. Epstein's apartment is located.
|
"The apartment was more like a building than a house; it had eight stories."Source
"Inside, it was “very dark,” “very, very -- like an old building.”"Source
"It had “fabric wallpaper, like red curtains, lots of artwork, statues, paintings.”"Source
"The artwork was “a little creepy personally,” with a “dark theme,” “intimidating” with “animal heads and strange things.”"Source
"The artwork included “[p]aintings of naked women and orgies and things like that.”"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,753 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document