DOJ-OGR-00017287.jpg
567 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
567 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a discussion between the judge and several attorneys (Mr. Pagliuca, Ms. Menninger, Ms. Sternheim) regarding the scheduling of jury deliberations. The judge sets the hours for the following day and considers the possibility of the jury working on an upcoming Thursday, noting that the court is not always closed before Christmas Eve.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Unknown, likely attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, apologizes to the Court for being delayed.
|
| MS. MENNINGER | Unknown, likely attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, explains that someone was in the lockup.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, setting the schedule for jury deliberations and responding to attorneys.
|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Unknown, likely attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, addresses the Judge regarding jury scheduling on holidays.
|
| Judge | Judge |
Addressed by Ms. Sternheim, referring to the person identified as 'THE COURT'.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Thursday
The Court considers it possible for the jury to deliberate on Thursday, and suggests offering them the option if they are not finished by tomorrow.
Court
jurors
today
The court proceeding documented in the transcript, discussing jury deliberation schedules.
Courtroom
tomorrow
Planned jury deliberation from 9:00 AM to 4:30 PM, with a lunch break at 12:00 PM. The jury will be dismissed for the day at 5:00 PM.
Court
jurors
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned by Ms. Menninger as the location of an individual who was delayed in returning to court.
|
Relationships (3)
Mr. Pagliuca addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and apologizes for a delay, indicating a formal, professional relationship within a legal setting.
Ms. Sternheim addresses the Court as 'Judge' and asks a procedural question about jury scheduling, indicating a formal, professional relationship within a legal setting.
Ms. Menninger provides an explanation to the Court regarding a delay, indicating a professional interaction within a legal proceeding.
Key Quotes (3)
"He was in the lockup back there."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Explaining why someone (presumably Mr. Pagliuca or his client) was delayed in returning to the courtroom.)
DOJ-OGR-00017287.jpg
Quote #1
"We would like to end today at 5 p.m., deliberate from 9 to 4:30 tomorrow, and have lunch at 12 noon if possible."Source
— THE COURT
(Setting the schedule for the jury's deliberations for the following day.)
DOJ-OGR-00017287.jpg
Quote #2
"And actually, the Court is not always closed before Christmas Eve."Source
— THE COURT
(Responding to Ms. Sternheim's inquiry about the jury working on a Thursday near a holiday, indicating flexibility in the court's schedule.)
DOJ-OGR-00017287.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,564 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 769 Filed 08/10/22 Page 9 of 19 3100
LCLVMAXT
LCLVMAXT
1 9 to 4:30 tomorrow, and have lunch at 12 noon if possible. So
2 I'll bring them out at 5.
3 MR. PAGLIUCA: I apologize, your Honor.
4 It took a while to get back here.
5 THE COURT: I can't hear you, but that's fine.
6 MS. MENNINGER: He was in the lockup back there.
7 THE COURT: I see.
8 I'll give you the note, Mr. Pagliuca.
9 We would like to end today at 5 p.m., deliberate from
10 9 to 4:30 tomorrow, and have lunch at 12 noon if possible.
11 So I'll dismiss them -- I'll bring them out to dismiss
12 them at 5, bearing instructions in mind.
13 I think the only open question in my mind, I have
14 explored, given the timing, the efficiency with which trial
15 proceeded, it is possible for them to deliberate on Thursday.
16 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I was going to ask you --
17 apologize. I have been in situations where on holidays judges
18 have invited the jury, if they wish to come in. I think given
19 the circumstances here, just Thursday --
20 THE COURT: Yes. And actually, the Court is not
21 always closed before Christmas Eve. So when I thought we were
22 proceeding to trial, it made sense not to sit that day, but --
23 and that is the jurors' expectation, so they may not be able
24 to. But I think if they are not finished their deliberations
25 tomorrow, I should offer that.
2 I'll bring them out at 5.
3 MR. PAGLIUCA: I apologize, your Honor.
4 It took a while to get back here.
5 THE COURT: I can't hear you, but that's fine.
6 MS. MENNINGER: He was in the lockup back there.
7 THE COURT: I see.
8 I'll give you the note, Mr. Pagliuca.
9 We would like to end today at 5 p.m., deliberate from
10 9 to 4:30 tomorrow, and have lunch at 12 noon if possible.
11 So I'll dismiss them -- I'll bring them out to dismiss
12 them at 5, bearing instructions in mind.
13 I think the only open question in my mind, I have
14 explored, given the timing, the efficiency with which trial
15 proceeded, it is possible for them to deliberate on Thursday.
16 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I was going to ask you --
17 apologize. I have been in situations where on holidays judges
18 have invited the jury, if they wish to come in. I think given
19 the circumstances here, just Thursday --
20 THE COURT: Yes. And actually, the Court is not
21 always closed before Christmas Eve. So when I thought we were
22 proceeding to trial, it made sense not to sit that day, but --
23 and that is the jurors' expectation, so they may not be able
24 to. But I think if they are not finished their deliberations
25 tomorrow, I should offer that.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017287
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document