DOJ-OGR-00021645.jpg

495 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 495 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from June 29, 2023, detailing a discussion between the judge (THE COURT) and two counsels (Ms. Moe and Ms. Sternheim). The judge outlines post-trial housekeeping matters, including the defendant's right to appeal within 14 days, and states the Court's intention to set the conspiracy end date as July 2004 in the final judgment. Ms. Moe acknowledges this, noting she will review the records and submit a letter if there is a discrepancy with the sentencing transcript.

People (3)

Name Role Context
MS. MOE Counsel
Speaking on behalf of a client, responding to the Court's questions and statements regarding the judgment and conspir...
MS. STERNHEIM Counsel
Speaking to the court, indicating no other matters and no objection.
THE COURT Judge
Presiding over the case, issuing orders, stating intentions for the judgment, and addressing counsel.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
The Court Judicial body
The presiding judicial entity in the case, making decisions and issuing judgments.
The government Government agency
Mentioned by Ms. Moe as not having other matters to discuss. Also mentioned as having taken a different position on t...
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed in the footer as the court reporting service that transcribed the proceeding.

Timeline (2 events)

2004-07
The Court states its belief that the end of the conspiracy date, based on acts in furtherance of criminal conduct, was in July of 2004.
2023-06-29
A court hearing where the judge discusses the forthcoming judgment, the end date of a conspiracy, and appellate rights.
Southern District Court (implied)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by the name of the court reporting company, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."

Relationships (2)

MS. MOE Professional THE COURT
Ms. Moe is acting as counsel and addressing the judge as 'your Honor' in a formal court proceeding.
MS. STERNHEIM Professional THE COURT
Ms. Sternheim is acting as counsel and addressing the judge in a formal court proceeding.

Key Quotes (3)

"The notice of appeal must be filed within 14 days of the judgment of conviction."
Source
— THE COURT (Informing the defendant of their appellate rights and the deadline for filing an appeal.)
DOJ-OGR-00021645.jpg
Quote #1
"I will issue the judgment -- I should just say, Ms. Moe, the Court intends to indicate the end of the conspiracy date as the last date in the record, which I believe is in July of 2004, of acts in furtherance of the criminal conduct..."
Source
— THE COURT (Informing counsel of a specific detail to be included in the final judgment regarding the timeline of the conspiracy.)
DOJ-OGR-00021645.jpg
Quote #2
"If that date is different from the sentencing transcript, we will submit a letter to the Court, but otherwise no objection, your Honor."
Source
— MS. MOE (Responding to the Court's statement about the conspiracy end date, reserving the right to object via letter if a discrepancy is found after reviewing records.)
DOJ-OGR-00021645.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,406 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page215 of 217
SA-469
100
M6s2Max2
1 appellate rights. You have the right to appeal your conviction
2 and your sentence. The notice of appeal must be filed within
3 14 days of the judgment of conviction.
4 Other matters to take up counsel?
5 MS. MOE: Not from the government, your Honor. Thank
6 you.
7 MS. STERNHEIM: No. Thank you.
8 THE COURT: Let me note, I will issue a housekeeping
9 order posttrial to ensure complete docketing of all -- any
10 outstanding materials and complete records, so please look for
11 that. I will issue the judgment -- I should just say, Ms. Moe,
12 the Court intends to indicate the end of the conspiracy date as
13 the last date in the record, which I believe is in July of
14 2004, of acts in furtherance of the criminal conduct, and
15 obviously the government took a different position with respect
16 to that. But in light of the Court's finding, any objection to
17 that?
18 MS. MOE: No, your Honor. We will review the
19 exhibits. If that date is different from the sentencing
20 transcript, we will submit a letter to the Court, but otherwise
21 no objection, your Honor.
22 MS. STERNHEIM: No objection.
23 THE COURT: All right.
24 MS. MOE: With apologies, your Honor, with respect to
25 the judgment, in light of the Court's decision to impose an
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.•••
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00021645

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document