This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, covering the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca objects to the admission of exhibits 2C through 2W, arguing they were not written by Mr. Alessi or his wife and lack authentication. The Court (Judge) asks to see 'the book' containing the exhibits and subsequently overrules the objection.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Comey | Prosecutor / Attorney |
Discussing the offering of exhibits 2C through 2W and interacting with the judge.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Objecting to exhibits 2C through 2W based on lack of authentication and authorship.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, reviewing 'the book', and overruling objections.
|
| Mr. Alessi | Witness |
Subject of the direct examination (header) and mentioned regarding authorship of exhibits.
|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney (Mentioned) |
Mentioned by Mr. Pagliuca, seemingly in error or correction before naming Ms. Comey.
|
| Mr. Alessi's wife | Mentioned Person |
Mentioned by defense counsel as not being the author of the exhibits in question.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Implied by footer code DOJ-OGR
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on Southern District Reporters footer and Case ID format.
|
"I don't think we're offering 2B, so we'll just do 2C through 2W."Source
"As I understand it, none of these exhibits being offered were written by Mr. Alessi or his wife and have not been authenticated, and so I object to all of those exhibits."Source
"I'm overruling the objection to -- so you're not seeking 2A, just 2C --"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,537 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document