DOJ-OGR-00019137.jpg
545 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
545 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between the judge, a government attorney (Ms. Moe), and another attorney (Mr. Pagliuca). The attorneys and the judge debate the proper way to present documentary evidence to the jury, specifically whether it can be done without a witness on the stand. Mr. Pagliuca objects to the government's proposed method, and the judge expresses concern that it would be improper.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
Speaking to the court about the process of presenting evidence to the jury.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the case, questioning the attorneys about the proposed procedure for presenting evidence.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney |
Expressing confusion and objection to the government's proposed method of presenting evidence without a witness.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| government | Government agency |
Referred to as the party wishing to publish documents and present evidence to the jury.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion in court regarding the procedural method for the government to present exhibits to the jury without a witness on the stand.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (3)
Ms. Moe addresses the judge as 'Your Honor' and proposes a procedure for the trial, indicating an attorney-judge relationship.
Mr. Pagliuca addresses the judge as 'your Honor' and objects to a proposed trial procedure, indicating an attorney-judge relationship.
They are on opposing sides of a procedural argument in court. Ms. Moe, representing the government's position, suggests a method that Mr. Pagliuca then objects to.
Key Quotes (3)
"But the witness is providing testimony over which they have no personal knowledge. You're simply asking them to do the work of the government in the closing."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge's response to Ms. Moe's suggestion about using a witness to guide the jury through exhibits, expressing concern about the nature of such testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00019137.jpg
Quote #1
"I don't understand that process, I guess, your Honor."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Expressing confusion and seeking clarification about the government's proposal to present documents to the jury without a witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00019137.jpg
Quote #2
"I do object to that process, your"Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Formally objecting to the procedure of having the government direct the jury to look at exhibits without a witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00019137.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,528 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 757 Filed 08/10/22 Page 13 of 49 1986
LC9VMAXT
LC9VMAXT
1 law enforcement agent, who had no involvement in the
2 investigation of the case and who isn't providing testimony
3 essentially pursuant to 1006.
4 MS. MOE: Your Honor, if the Court's preference is for
5 us to, without a person on the stand, just ask the jury to turn
6 from one exhibit to another to another, we can do that. I
7 think that is slightly more awkward than facilitating that
8 through a witness and pointing out the connections between two
9 things.
10 THE COURT: Right. But the witness is providing
11 testimony over which they have no personal knowledge. You're
12 simply asking them to do the work of the government in the
13 closing.
14 So, Mr. Pagliuca, do you have any objection to the
15 government publishing a few documents, going to a few points,
16 and then we move on, without a witness?
17 MR. PAGLIUCA: I don't understand that process, I
18 guess, your Honor. We're simply going to -- is this with a
19 witness or without a witness?
20 THE COURT: Without a witness.
21 MR. PAGLIUCA: We're simply going to say, The
22 government would like the jury to look at this and then look at
23 that?
24 THE COURT: Yes.
25 MR. PAGLIUCA: I do object to that process, your
2 investigation of the case and who isn't providing testimony
3 essentially pursuant to 1006.
4 MS. MOE: Your Honor, if the Court's preference is for
5 us to, without a person on the stand, just ask the jury to turn
6 from one exhibit to another to another, we can do that. I
7 think that is slightly more awkward than facilitating that
8 through a witness and pointing out the connections between two
9 things.
10 THE COURT: Right. But the witness is providing
11 testimony over which they have no personal knowledge. You're
12 simply asking them to do the work of the government in the
13 closing.
14 So, Mr. Pagliuca, do you have any objection to the
15 government publishing a few documents, going to a few points,
16 and then we move on, without a witness?
17 MR. PAGLIUCA: I don't understand that process, I
18 guess, your Honor. We're simply going to -- is this with a
19 witness or without a witness?
20 THE COURT: Without a witness.
21 MR. PAGLIUCA: We're simply going to say, The
22 government would like the jury to look at this and then look at
23 that?
24 THE COURT: Yes.
25 MR. PAGLIUCA: I do object to that process, your
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00019137
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document