An email exchange from November 14, 2016, shortly after the US Presidential election, between New York Times financial reporter Landon Thomas Jr. and Jeffrey Epstein. Thomas asks Epstein for intelligence regarding Donald Trump's Treasury Secretary pick, speculating on Steven Mnuchin versus a 'bigger name,' and notes that 'Hillary loving' hedge funders are now 'Trump lovers' due to market profits. Epstein replies briefly stating he has 'no intel but lots of profits.'
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Landon Thomas Jr. | Financial Reporter, New York Times |
Sender of the initial inquiry seeking intel on Treasury appointments; correspondent with Epstein.
|
| Jeffrey E. (Epstein) | Recipient/Sender |
Replied to Thomas regarding profits; appears to be a source being queried for political intel.
|
| Donald Trump | President-Elect (implied) |
Subject of the email thread ('Re: Trump'); discussion of his cabinet choices and market impact ('Trump trade').
|
| Reince Priebus | Political Figure |
Mentioned regarding his choice (likely as Chief of Staff) and its implication for Treasury picks.
|
| Steven Mnuchin | Political Figure |
Mentioned as a potential Treasury pick, though Thomas speculates Trump might want a 'bigger name'.
|
| Ronald Reagan | Former President |
Used as a comparison ('Reagan 2.0').
|
| Hillary Clinton | Former Presidential Candidate |
Referenced in 'Hillary loving hedgies'.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| New York Times |
Employer of Landon Thomas Jr.
|
|
| US Treasury |
Department discussed regarding potential leadership appointments.
|
|
| JEE |
Entity mentioned in the confidentiality disclaimer (likely Jeffrey E. Epstein).
|
"no intel but lots of profits"Source
"Any further intel on Treasury?"Source
"The Trump trade certainly seems to have legs -- all the Hillary loving hedgies I am talking to are congratulating themselves for making so much money last week. They are all Trump lovers now!"Source
"do you agree with my thesis?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,609 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document