This document is a court transcript from June 29, 2023, detailing a procedural discussion about the order of statements. Counsel Ms. Moe asks the Court's preference for when victims should speak, and the Court outlines the sequence as government, victims, defense counsel, and then Ms. Maxwell. After confirming no objections from counsel, the Court calls for a luncheon recess until 1:00.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Counsel |
Speaks on behalf of victims to clarify the sequence of statements with the Court.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Responds to Ms. Moe, outlines the anticipated order of statements, confirms with counsel, and calls for a recess.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Party to the case (likely defendant) |
Mentioned by the Court as the final party who may wish to make a statement, following defense counsel.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Counsel |
Responds to the Court, stating she has no objection to the proposed order of statements.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the document as the court reporting service.
|
"With respect to the sequence of events, just so victims are aware, would the Court prefer to hear from victims before the Court hears from the parties or after?"Source
"I was anticipating government, victim statements, defense counsel and then Ms. Maxwell if she wishes to make a statement."Source
"I'll see you at 1:00. Thank you."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (986 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document