DOJ-OGR-00021600.jpg

398 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 398 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from June 29, 2023, detailing a procedural discussion about the order of statements. Counsel Ms. Moe asks the Court's preference for when victims should speak, and the Court outlines the sequence as government, victims, defense counsel, and then Ms. Maxwell. After confirming no objections from counsel, the Court calls for a luncheon recess until 1:00.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ms. Moe Counsel
Speaks on behalf of victims to clarify the sequence of statements with the Court.
The Court Judge
Responds to Ms. Moe, outlines the anticipated order of statements, confirms with counsel, and calls for a recess.
Ms. Maxwell Party to the case (likely defendant)
Mentioned by the Court as the final party who may wish to make a statement, following defense counsel.
Ms. Sternheim Counsel
Responds to the Court, stating she has no objection to the proposed order of statements.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the document as the court reporting service.

Timeline (2 events)

2023-06-29
A discussion took place regarding the procedural ordering of statements from various parties, including victims.
Courtroom
2023-06-29
The Court announced a luncheon recess until 1:00.
Courtroom

Relationships (2)

Ms. Moe Professional The Court
Ms. Moe, as counsel, addresses the Court respectfully as 'your Honor' and defers to the Court's preference on procedural matters.
Ms. Sternheim Professional The Court
Ms. Sternheim, as counsel, responds directly to the Court's question, indicating she has no objection to the proposed order.

Key Quotes (3)

"With respect to the sequence of events, just so victims are aware, would the Court prefer to hear from victims before the Court hears from the parties or after?"
Source
— MS. MOE (Asking the judge for procedural clarification on the order of statements.)
DOJ-OGR-00021600.jpg
Quote #1
"I was anticipating government, victim statements, defense counsel and then Ms. Maxwell if she wishes to make a statement."
Source
— THE COURT (Responding to Ms. Moe and outlining the planned sequence for hearing from all parties.)
DOJ-OGR-00021600.jpg
Quote #2
"I'll see you at 1:00. Thank you."
Source
— THE COURT (Announcing the start of a luncheon recess.)
DOJ-OGR-00021600.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (986 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page170 of 217
SA-424
55
M6SQmax1
1 break.
2 Ms. Moe
3 MS. MOE: With respect to the sequence of events, just
4 so victims are aware, would the Court prefer to hear from
5 victims before the Court hears from the parties or after? We
6 defer to the Court, but it would be helpful to know for the
7 victims.
8 THE COURT: I was anticipating government, victim
9 statements, defense counsel and then Ms. Maxwell if she wishes
10 to make a statement. My staff did provide counsel for the
11 victims making statements an order in which they're speaking.
12 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.
13 THE COURT: Any objection to that ordering, Ms. Moe?
14 MS. MOE: No, your Honor. Thank you.
15 THE COURT: Ms. Sternheim?
16 MS. STERNHEIM: I'm on now. No. Thank you.
17 THE COURT: I'll see you at 1:00. Thank you.
18 (Luncheon recess taken)
19 (Continued on next page)
20
21
22
23
24
25
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.•••
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00021600

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document