This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a discussion between a judge and attorneys Rohrbach, Comey, and Everdell. The main topic is the procedure for admitting redacted photos into evidence, with the court ruling that the jury will see unredacted versions while the public sees the redacted copies. Attorney Everdell requests and is granted time to review the redactions before they are formally moved into evidence.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, addressing the court.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, referred to as 'your Honor', presiding over the proceedings and making rulings on procedure.
|
| Ms. Comey | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, addressing the court regarding the submission of evidence.
|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, responding to the court's question about objections and requesting time to review redactions.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| government | Government agency |
Mentioned as the entity providing the redacted photos as evidence.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
"I will ask, so going forward, any items that had been admitted in redaction form to the extent the witness or the jury is looking at the unredacted version, the government should show the public the redacted version."Source
"Your Honor, we got them pretty late, we haven't a chance to review the redactions. I'm assuming they're fine, we don't have objection to process, we would just like a chance to look at them."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,412 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document