This document is a page from a court filing dated July 2, 2020, which outlines the court's findings for partially closing a proceeding. The court justifies this closure by citing the substantial interest in protecting public health and safety from the spread of COVID-19, referencing the 5,802 confirmed cases and 373 deaths in New Hampshire since the pandemic began.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brennan, J. | Justice (concurring) |
Cited in the 1980 case Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia for discussing the functions of public access to court p...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Richmond Newspapers, Inc. | Company |
Party in the cited case Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia.
|
| N.H. Dep’t of Health and Human Servs. | Government agency |
Cited as a source for COVID-19 case data in New Hampshire in a footnote.
|
| N.H. Pub. Radio | Media organization |
Cited as a source for tracking COVID-19 data in New Hampshire in a footnote.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the case name Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia.
|
|
|
The location where the court is making its finding and where COVID-19 statistics are being reported.
|
"the court finds that protecting the health and safety of the public and the parties to this proceeding from the spread of COVID-19 is a substantial interest that would be jeopardized and prejudiced if the court did not impose this partial closure."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,613 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document