This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between attorneys Ms. Comey, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge. The conversation centers on whether to admit an exhibit into evidence immediately or reserve it for a later time. Ms. Comey gives contradictory answers, first agreeing to reserve and then stating she wants to admit it now, which she explains by saying she misunderstood the judge's question.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, addressing the court and discussing the admission of an exhibit.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, addressing the court and Ms. Comey.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the court transcript, presiding over the proceedings and questioning the attorneys.
|
| Alessi | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the subject of a direct examination ("Alessi - Direct").
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting company, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
"I think it's fine to reserve, your Honor."Source
"Your Honor, I apologize if I was not clear, but we do want to admit this through this witness."Source
"It wasn't that you weren't clear. That's an opposite answer of the one you just gave."Source
"I misunderstood the question."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,293 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document