DOJ-OGR-00009564.jpg
497 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
497 KB
Summary
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing (Document 621) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on February 25, 2022. The filing outlines legal arguments against a defendant's motions to vacate their conviction, dismiss the indictment due to alleged pre-trial delays, and for a judgment of acquittal. The document structures the arguments, including discussions on applicable law and specific counts of the indictment.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Mentioned throughout the table of contents as the subject of various motions and legal arguments, such as motions to ...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government | government agency |
Mentioned in the context of legal arguments, specifically regarding whether it delayed the indictment for an improper...
|
| DOJ-OGR | government agency |
Appears as part of a document identifier (DOJ-OGR-00009564) at the bottom of the page, likely indicating the Departme...
|
Timeline (1 events)
Relationships (1)
The document is a table of contents for a legal filing outlining arguments between the Defendant and the Government regarding the Defendant's conviction, indictment, and motions.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,297 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 621 Filed 02/25/22 Page 2 of 51
Table of Contents
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ................................................................................................................. 2
LEGAL STANDARD ............................................................................................................................ 2
ARGUMENT ......................................................................................................................................... 3
I. The Defendant Was Convicted of the Crimes Charged in the Indictment, So No
Constructive Amendment or Variance Occurred........................................................................ 3
Constructive Amendment or Variance Occurred........................................................................ 3
A. Applicable Law................................................................................................................ 4
B. Discussion........................................................................................................................ 6
II. The Court Should Enter Judgment on Counts Three and Five ............................................ 24
A. Applicable Law.............................................................................................................. 25
B. Discussion...................................................................................................................... 26
III. The Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Her Conviction and Dismiss the Indictment Based on
Alleged Improper Pre-Trial Delay Should Be Denied.............................................................. 33
Alleged Improper Pre-Trial Delay Should Be Denied.............................................................. 33
A. The Defendant Has Failed to Demonstrate Actual and Substantial Prejudice .......... 34
B. The Defendant Has Failed to Establish that the Government Delayed the Indictment
for an Improper Purpose ................................................................................................. 44
for an Improper Purpose ................................................................................................. 44
IV. The Court Should Deny the Defendant’s Motion for Judgment of Acquittal Under Rule
29 ................................................................................................................................................. 47
29 ................................................................................................................................................. 47
CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................... 50
DOJ-OGR-00009564
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document