DOJ-OGR-00008496.jpg
279 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
0
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
279 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a legal filing, likely jury instructions, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 17, 2021. It outlines the legal test for determining if the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, is guilty as an 'aider and abettor' in a criminal venture. The jury is instructed to consider whether she knowingly associated with the venture and acted to make it succeed, with a guilty verdict required for affirmative answers and a not guilty verdict for negative answers.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Identified as the Defendant in a criminal case. The document outlines the conditions under which she could be found g...
|
Timeline (1 events)
Key Quotes (4)
"Did the Defendant knowingly and willfully associate herself with the criminal venture?"Source
— Unspecified (likely the judge)
(A question posed to the jury as part of the criteria for determining guilt.)
DOJ-OGR-00008496.jpg
Quote #1
"Did the Defendant seek by her actions to make the criminal venture succeed?"Source
— Unspecified (likely the judge)
(A question posed to the jury as part of the criteria for determining guilt.)
DOJ-OGR-00008496.jpg
Quote #2
"If she did, then Ms. Maxwell is an aider and abettor, and therefore guilty of the offense."Source
— Unspecified (likely the judge)
(Instruction to the jury on the consequence of affirmative answers to the preceding questions.)
DOJ-OGR-00008496.jpg
Quote #3
"If, on the other hand, your answer to any of these questions is “no,” then Ms. Maxwell is not an aider and abettor, and you must find her not guilty under that theory."Source
— Unspecified (likely the judge)
(Instruction to the jury on the consequence of a negative answer to the preceding questions.)
DOJ-OGR-00008496.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (532 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 562 Filed 12/17/21 Page 40 of 82
1 2. Did the Defendant knowingly and willfully associate herself with the criminal
2 venture?
3 3. Did the Defendant seek by her actions to make the criminal venture succeed?
4 If she did, then Ms. Maxwell is an aider and abettor, and therefore guilty of the offense.
5 If, on the other hand, your answer to any of these questions is “no,” then Ms. Maxwell is not an
6 aider and abettor, and you must find her not guilty under that theory.
39
DOJ-OGR-00008496
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document