DOJ-OGR-00017093.jpg
604 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
604 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Moe, likely a prosecutor, to a jury. She argues that the defense has deliberately misled the jury by taking a witness's (Jane's) statements and a legal document out of context. Ms. Moe highlights a specific portion of that document which states the defendant, Maxwell, facilitated and was present for the sexual abuse of Jane, a part she claims the defense intentionally omitted.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney |
Mentioned in the header as giving the summation.
|
| Jane | Victim/Witness |
A person whose testimony and abuse are being discussed. She was questioned about an application and a legal document.
|
| Epstein | Abuser |
Mentioned as someone involved in Jane's abuse.
|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Referred to as the defendant who allegedly facilitated the sexual abuse of Jane and was frequently present when it oc...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the document, likely the court reporting agency.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Relationships (2)
The document states that 'Maxwell facilitated the sexual abuse of Jane and was frequently present when the sexual abuse of Jane occurred.'
Key Quotes (2)
"Nothing has been difficult for me."Source
— Jane
(Jane's answer to a question on an application asking to list two difficult works performed in an orchestra, band, or ensemble within the past year.)
DOJ-OGR-00017093.jpg
Quote #1
"Maxwell facilitated the sexual abuse of Jane and was frequently present when the sexual abuse of Jane occurred."Source
— A legal document (interrogatory)
(A portion of a legal document that Ms. Moe claims the defense did not read to the jury, which directly implicates the defendant, Maxwell.)
DOJ-OGR-00017093.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,488 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 72 of 257
LCKVMAX4 Summation – Ms. Moe
LCKVMAX4 Summation – Ms. Moe
1 nothing has been difficult for me; correct?
2 I guess I did.
3 But then you saw the actual application, the whole
4 thing.
5 What was that question really about? List two
6 difficult works performed in orchestra, band, or an ensemble
7 within the past year. And Jane answered: Nothing has been
8 difficult for me.
9 So what does that mean? The defense spent a long time
10 trying to discredit Jane with a line that was really about
11 orchestra music. Even Jane didn't realize she was being misled
12 this way until she was shown the question itself on redirect.
13 Here's another example: Remember how Jane was asked
14 about a legal document called an interrogatory? She told you
15 that she'd never seen this document before and she had no idea
16 what it was. And the defense suggested to you that this legal
17 document means that Jane said nobody else besides Epstein had
18 been involved in her abuse. There's this long question here.
19 But guess what: Here's the portion that the defendant
20 didn't show you and didn't read to you. It says, Maxwell
21 facilitated the sexual abuse of Jane and was frequently present
22 when the sexual abuse of Jane occurred. It's right there in
23 that same document. They didn't read that part to you;
24 instead, they plucked parts out of context to create a
25 misimpression.
2 I guess I did.
3 But then you saw the actual application, the whole
4 thing.
5 What was that question really about? List two
6 difficult works performed in orchestra, band, or an ensemble
7 within the past year. And Jane answered: Nothing has been
8 difficult for me.
9 So what does that mean? The defense spent a long time
10 trying to discredit Jane with a line that was really about
11 orchestra music. Even Jane didn't realize she was being misled
12 this way until she was shown the question itself on redirect.
13 Here's another example: Remember how Jane was asked
14 about a legal document called an interrogatory? She told you
15 that she'd never seen this document before and she had no idea
16 what it was. And the defense suggested to you that this legal
17 document means that Jane said nobody else besides Epstein had
18 been involved in her abuse. There's this long question here.
19 But guess what: Here's the portion that the defendant
20 didn't show you and didn't read to you. It says, Maxwell
21 facilitated the sexual abuse of Jane and was frequently present
22 when the sexual abuse of Jane occurred. It's right there in
23 that same document. They didn't read that part to you;
24 instead, they plucked parts out of context to create a
25 misimpression.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017093
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document