DOJ-OGR-00017625.jpg

555 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 555 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a procedural discussion between the judge and two attorneys, Ms. Moe and Ms. Menninger. The parties are debating the timing and method for resolving two or three outstanding issues, weighing the efficiency of handling them immediately against the preference for a sidebar and the dependency of one issue on upcoming witness testimony. The conversation occurs while they are waiting for the jurors to be brought in.

People (3)

Name Role Context
MS. MOE Counsel
Speaker in the court transcript, addressing the court regarding defense counsel's preference for a sidebar.
MS. MENNINGER Counsel
Speaker in the court transcript, discussing which issues can be addressed immediately versus those dependent on witne...
THE COURT Judge
Speaker in the court transcript, presiding over the proceedings and inquiring about resolving issues before the jury ...

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
A discussion between the court and counsel (Ms. Moe and Ms. Menninger) about resolving outstanding issues before the jury is brought in. They debate whether to handle the matters immediately to save time or at a sidebar, with some issues being dependent on future witness testimony.
Courtroom

Relationships (2)

MS. MOE professional THE COURT
Ms. Moe addresses the court as 'Your Honor' and discusses procedural matters, indicating a formal counsel-judge relationship.
MS. MENNINGER professional THE COURT
Ms. Menninger addresses the court as 'your Honor' and provides information about the case's progress, indicating a formal counsel-judge relationship.

Key Quotes (3)

"Your Honor, I think defense counsel's preference was to do that at a sidebar."
Source
— MS. MOE (Responding to the court's suggestion to resolve issues while waiting for the jurors.)
DOJ-OGR-00017625.jpg
Quote #1
"I just meant as a time saver can we do it now."
Source
— THE COURT (Explaining the rationale for wanting to address issues immediately rather than waiting for a sidebar.)
DOJ-OGR-00017625.jpg
Quote #2
"I think there are two of the three that we can do now; but the third one depends on what the witness says, your Honor."
Source
— MS. MENNINGER (Informing the court about the feasibility of resolving the outstanding issues at that moment.)
DOJ-OGR-00017625.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,381 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 16 of 264 422
LC1VMAX1
1 narrowed the scope of any disagreement.
2 There are two remaining topics. And I think we've
3 agreed that before those topics are raised at a break or before
4 the jury comes out, we're going to confer with the witness's
5 counsel just to confirm what issues might be identifying as to
6 those two particular issues. I'm hopeful that we'll be able to
7 resolve any disagreement there, but we want to just work that
8 out before that comes out before the jury. And I think there
9 are one or two issues that we've agreed that won't be raised
10 without a sidebar in advance to discuss them.
11 THE COURT: Okay. Is there no way to do that now
12 while we're waiting for our jurors or --
13 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I think defense counsel's
14 preference was to do that at a sidebar.
15 THE COURT: It's here.
16 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
17 THE COURT: I just meant I'm happy to do it at the
18 sidebar, to the extent we're referencing the specific
19 identifying information. I just meant as a time saver can we
20 do it now.
21 MS. MENNINGER: I think there are two of the three
22 that we can do now; but the third one depends on what the
23 witness says, your Honor.
24 THE COURT: Okay.
25 Let me just get a check on our juror numbers.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017625

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document