HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015921.jpg

1.42 MB

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Book excerpt or academic paper/article
File Size: 1.42 MB
Summary

This document appears to be a page from a book or paper discussing software engineering theory, specifically Fred Brooks' concepts of 'Essential' versus 'Accidental' complexity. It references Brooks' work 'The Mythical Man Month' and directs readers to a paper by James Tagg. While bearing a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, the text itself contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein, flight logs, or financial transactions; it is likely a collateral document included in a larger discovery production.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Fred Brooks Computer Architect/Author
Subject of the text, author of 'No Silver Bullet' and 'The Mythical Man Month'
James Tagg Author (Implied)
Text refers to 'read my paper... at www.jamestagg.com', implying Tagg is the author of this specific document.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Tenth World Software Conference
Venue where the original article by Brooks appeared
Wikipedia
Mentioned as a reference source for listing countries
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015921'

Timeline (1 events)

Unknown (Historical)
Tenth World Software Conference
Unknown

Locations (1)

Location Context
Used as an example for data entry decisions (UK vs GB)

Relationships (2)

Fred Brooks Authorship The Mythical Man Month
It was subsequently expanded into the, now famous, book, The Mythical Man Month.
James Tagg Authorship The Free Will Universe
read my paper The Free Will Universe at www.jamestagg.com/freewillpaper

Key Quotes (3)

"Brooks believed solving real world problems involves understanding the essential complexity of life."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015921.jpg
Quote #1
"Good news for programmers as this means job security!"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015921.jpg
Quote #2
"Making software is, therefore, dominated by the design time, and design is all about capturing the essential complexity of a task."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015921.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,184 characters)

In No Silver Bullet – Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering, Fred Brooks explains why writing software is hard, and why machines are not going to do it for us anytime soon. The original article appeared in the proceedings of the Tenth World Software Conference. It was subsequently expanded into the, now famous, book, The Mythical Man Month.
Brooks believed solving real world problems involves understanding the essential complexity of life. ‘Accidental Complexity’ – the simple type – is the time-consuming part of writing software, for example, listing all 220 countries of the world in a website, or making sure all the buttons in an interface line up correctly. These tasks are tedious – you have to look up all the countries in Wikipedia and make decisions, such as whether the United Kingdom will be denoted ‘UK’ or ‘GB’. They don’t need any real ingenuity. ‘Essential Complexity’ is altogether different. It involves understanding the world and setting out the rules in meticulous detail. Brooks argued essential complexity is not susceptible to being sped up by machine processes. Navigating these architectural decisions cannot be automated. He gives us an analogy by comparing writing software to building a house.
When you build a house, an architect designs it, an engineer makes the calculations to ensure it is safe, and a construction firm builds it. The construction process dominates the cost and time. In software projects, an engineer writes a program that precisely defines the design and the construction and calculation is done by a compiler – software that takes the design and makes it machine-readable. Compilers operate in a fraction of a second. Making software is, therefore, dominated by the design time, and design is all about capturing the essential complexity of a task.
This chapter will try to show where essential complexity comes from, why computers can’t tackle this sort of complexity and, therefore, why they can’t write software. Good news for programmers as this means job security!
For a more thorough treatment of the mathematics read my paper The Free Will Universe at www.jamestagg.com/freewillpaper.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015921

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document