This document is an email thread from February 2014 detailing an online reputation management ('boosting strategy') campaign for Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein initiates the complaint by noting negative Google search results, specifically Wikipedia and New York Magazine articles referencing 'Solicitation of prostitution.' Consultants Tyler Shears and Christina Galbraith discuss their efforts to displace these results using press releases, content creation, and a 'Friends' page on the 'PED' website.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Christina Galbraith | Sender / PR or SEO Consultant |
Writing content and press releases to boost Epstein's online reputation; coordinating with PED.
|
| Tyler Shears | Recipient / SEO Strategist |
Managing the 'boosting strategy' to remove negative search results; discusses timelines and Google algorithms.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | CC Recipient / Subject |
Complaining about negative Google search results appearing on a 'different computer'. Uses email jeevacation@gmail.com.
|
| Richard Kahn | CC Recipient |
Included in the email chain regarding the boosting strategy.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
|
Subject of the manipulation strategy; references to 'google highlighter' and search results.
|
||
| PED |
Organization setting up a 'Friends' page to feature Jeffrey Epstein (Likely Program for Evolutionary Dynamics).
|
|
| Wikipedia |
Appears as the top search result in Epstein's complaint.
|
|
| New York Magazine |
Appears as the second search result in Epstein's complaint.
|
|
| Bear Stearns |
Mentioned in the Wikipedia snippet regarding Epstein's work history.
|
"About 4,880,000 results (0.33 seconds) different computer, not good"Source
"Also the PED set up a page called 'Friends' which is where they'll place jeffrey."Source
"Understand the two negatives are still present."Source
"We are working very hard to make this happen and should have Christina set up to support us with columns on a few top sites at no cost moving forward"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,772 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document