This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between the judge and several attorneys (Ms. Moe, Ms. Sternheim, Mr. Rohrbach) regarding trial procedures. Key topics include clarifying testimony about Ms. Maxwell, the status of contacts with a witness named 'Jane', and confirming an agreement that victim-witnesses will not observe the trial until after both the prosecution and defense have rested their cases.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell |
Mentioned in the context of testimony about whether she brought women to a location.
|
|
| Ms. Menninger |
Mentioned as someone who clarified a point on cross-examination regarding Ms. Maxwell.
|
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the legal proceeding, speaking with the attorneys.
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
An attorney speaking to the court about questioning and clarifying contacts with a witness named Jane.
|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Attorney |
An attorney who briefly thanks the judge.
|
| Jane | Witness |
A witness mentioned by Ms. Moe in the context of clarifying the status of contacts with her.
|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Attorney |
An attorney confirming an understanding with the court that victim-witnesses will not observe the trial until both si...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceeding.
|
"There were women there but not that she brought them, and I think that Ms. Menninger cleared that up on cross-examination as well."Source
"Our understanding is that none of the witnesses who are testifying as victims are intending to observe any of the trial until at least both sides have rested, which we've conveyed to the defense, and we understand there would be no objection to that."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,462 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document