DOJ-OGR-00000551.jpg
585 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
3
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
585 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019. In it, a lawyer named Mr. Weinberg argues that his client, a tier 3 registrant, has a long history of compliance with daily monitoring and has been careful to avoid any violations. Mr. Weinberg explains that his client was advised he did not need to physically appear in New York and details how his client's travel, monitored from the Virgin Islands, is carefully reported.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. WEINBERG | Lawyer |
Speaker in the court transcript, likely representing the 'registrant' being discussed.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the court transcript, interacting with Mr. Weinberg.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Appears in the footer of the document, likely the court reporting agency.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2019-07-24
A court hearing where Mr. Weinberg and The Court discuss a registrant's compliance with monitoring and appearance requirements.
Southern District Court (implied)
The registrant is described as traveling to Palm Beach on a certain day.
Palm Beach
registrant
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as a place where the registrant was potentially required to physically appear.
|
|
|
Described as the 'principal monitor' of the registrant's travels.
|
|
|
Mentioned as a travel destination for the registrant.
|
Relationships (2)
Mr. Weinberg is speaking on behalf of the unnamed registrant in court, referring to him as 'he' and discussing his legal obligations and compliance history, indicating a lawyer-client relationship.
They are engaged in a formal dialogue within a court proceeding, typical of a lawyer addressing a judge.
Key Quotes (4)
"I don't think I can reliably respond except to say that there was some discussion about whether or not he was required to physically appear in New York."Source
— MR. WEINBERG
(Responding to a question about the registrant's obligations to appear.)
DOJ-OGR-00000551.jpg
Quote #1
"He wouldn't have to come."Source
— THE COURT
(Responding to Mr. Weinberg's explanation of the registrant's 90-day appearance requirement.)
DOJ-OGR-00000551.jpg
Quote #2
"Nobody has ever given him or noticed a violation in almost ten years of daily monitoring."Source
— MR. WEINBERG
(Arguing for his client's history of compliance.)
DOJ-OGR-00000551.jpg
Quote #3
"He himself is extraordinarily careful not to trigger a federal SORA or a state SORNA violation, and he hasn't."Source
— MR. WEINBERG
(Describing his client's diligence in complying with sex offender registration laws.)
DOJ-OGR-00000551.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,527 characters)
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 41 of 74 41
1 in terms of the registrant's obligations to appear or submit
2 reports or whatever?
3 MR. WEINBERG: I don't think I can reliably respond
4 except to say that there was some discussion about whether or
5 not he was required to physically appear in New York.
6 And my understanding from the lawyers with personal
7 knowledge is he was told that unless he was here nine or more
8 days a month, he was not required to conform to the physical
9 90-day appearance, despite being a tier 3.
10 THE COURT: He wouldn't have to come.
11 MR. WEINBERG: Right. Nobody has ever given him or
12 noticed a violation in almost ten years of daily monitoring.
13 He's not someone that just stays at one location.
14 I've got a stack from one of his lawyers that I won't
15 burden the Court with about putting on record with the Virgin
16 Islands, which is the principal monitor of his travels every
17 day, what is the transportation, where is he going to be. I
18 see letters saying, we're delayed one day. We'll be coming
19 into Palm Beach on a certain day.
20 The point being, I think, two: One, there's been no
21 violation in nine years; that he's being carefully monitored.
22 He himself is extraordinarily careful not to trigger a federal
23 SORA or a state SORNA violation, and he hasn't.
24 Two, I think that speaks to his ability to be
25 disciplined, his ability to regulate his conduct consistent
2 reports or whatever?
3 MR. WEINBERG: I don't think I can reliably respond
4 except to say that there was some discussion about whether or
5 not he was required to physically appear in New York.
6 And my understanding from the lawyers with personal
7 knowledge is he was told that unless he was here nine or more
8 days a month, he was not required to conform to the physical
9 90-day appearance, despite being a tier 3.
10 THE COURT: He wouldn't have to come.
11 MR. WEINBERG: Right. Nobody has ever given him or
12 noticed a violation in almost ten years of daily monitoring.
13 He's not someone that just stays at one location.
14 I've got a stack from one of his lawyers that I won't
15 burden the Court with about putting on record with the Virgin
16 Islands, which is the principal monitor of his travels every
17 day, what is the transportation, where is he going to be. I
18 see letters saying, we're delayed one day. We'll be coming
19 into Palm Beach on a certain day.
20 The point being, I think, two: One, there's been no
21 violation in nine years; that he's being carefully monitored.
22 He himself is extraordinarily careful not to trigger a federal
23 SORA or a state SORNA violation, and he hasn't.
24 Two, I think that speaks to his ability to be
25 disciplined, his ability to regulate his conduct consistent
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00000551
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document