EFTA00037100.pdf

142 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing / court document (response to objection)
File Size: 142 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a legal filing (dated Nov 2, 2023) responding to objections regarding a class action settlement related to Jeffrey Epstein. It addresses allegations made by Ms. Ransome (and a redacted individual) that Class Counsel had undisclosed conflicts of interest and relationships with Epstein's associates. The filing argues these claims are meritless and asserts the settlement was reached through good faith negotiations.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Deceased financier
Mentioned regarding 'personal and professional relationships with Epstein's known associates'.
Ms. Ransome Objector
Accused of providing no basis for allegations of conflict; her objection to attorneys' fees is being challenged.
[REDACTED] Objector/Declarant
Name redacted in text and header. Submitted a declaration accusing Claims Administrator and Class Counsel of conflict...
Class Counsel Legal Representatives
Accused of maintaining relationships with Epstein associates; defending the settlement.
Claims Administrator Administrator
Accused of having conflicts of interest.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
The Court
Adjudicating the settlement and objections.

Timeline (1 events)

2023-11-02
Filing of response to Class Council Objection
Court (implied)

Relationships (1)

Class Counsel Alleged professional/personal connection Epstein's known associates
Objection claims Class Counsel maintained relationships with associates without adequate disclosure.

Key Quotes (3)

"Class Counsel 'has maintained personal and professional relationships with Epstein’s known associates with inadequate disclosure about the nature and scope of those relationships including prior law partners.'"
Source
EFTA00037100.pdf
Quote #1
"accuses the Claims Administrator and Class Counsel of having 'multiple conflicts of interest.'"
Source
EFTA00037100.pdf
Quote #2
"The Settlement is 'fair, reasonable, and adequate,' and 'the result of good faith, extensive arm’s-length and non-collusive negotiations.'"
Source
EFTA00037100.pdf
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,067 characters)

2023-11-02 Class Council Objection .pdf
Claims Administrator and Class Members. It also refers to a conflict with Class Counsel, claiming without substantiation that Class Counsel “has maintained personal and professional relationships with Epstein’s known associates with inadequate disclosure about the nature and scope of those relationships including prior law partners.” ECF No. 247, at 6. Ms. [REDACTED] declaration is more direct: it accuses the Claims Administrator and Class Counsel of having “multiple conflicts of interest.” ECF No. 247-1 ¶ 25; see also id. at ¶¶ 13, 26. These claims are meritless.10 Ms. Ransome provides no basis for her allegations of conflict, and the Court therefore has no reason to doubt that the Settlement is “fair, reasonable, and adequate,” and “the result of good faith, extensive arm’s-length and non-collusive negotiations.” ECF No. 182 ¶¶ 1, 2.
D. Ms. [REDACTED] Objection to the Proposed Attorneys’ Fees Is Meritless.
The Court should reject Ms. Ransome's Objection to the proposed attorneys' fees... Class
EFTA00037100

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document