DOJ-OGR-00009357.jpg
412 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
412 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript showing the direct examination of a witness named Brune. The questioning focuses on Brune's knowledge regarding a July 15th conference call and a July 21st letter, specifically probing whether Brune knew that statements made by a Ms. Trzaskoma during the call were incorrect. Brune denies having this knowledge and explains she read the transcript to understand a directive from Judge Pauley.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness |
The individual being questioned during a direct examination.
|
| Ms. Trzaskoma |
Mentioned as having made statements during a conference call and having informed Brune about the availability of the ...
|
|
| Judge Pauley | Judge |
Mentioned as having given a direction that prompted Brune to read the conference call transcript.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judicial body |
The entity with which a conference call was held and a letter was filed.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The court reporting agency that produced the transcript.
|
Timeline (2 events)
July 15th (year not specified)
A conference call was held with the Court. Ms. Trzaskoma made statements during this call. Brune was not a participant.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied location of the court proceedings, as indicated by the name of the court reporting agency.
|
Relationships (2)
Ms. Trzaskoma informed Brune about the conference call and its transcript, suggesting they are colleagues or on the same legal team.
Brune acted based on a direction from Judge Pauley, indicating a formal relationship within a legal proceeding.
Key Quotes (3)
"At the point at which you saw those emails, Ms. Brune, at the very least you knew that Ms. Trzaskoma's statements to the Court in that conference call were not correct?"Source
— Unnamed Questioner
(A question posed to the witness, Brune, suggesting she was aware of inaccuracies in Ms. Trzaskoma's statements.)
DOJ-OGR-00009357.jpg
Quote #1
"I disagree."Source
— Brune
(Brune's direct response, denying that she knew Ms. Trzaskoma's statements were incorrect.)
DOJ-OGR-00009357.jpg
Quote #2
"We had to respond, so I read the transcript to make sure that I knew what Judge Pauley was directing us to do."Source
— Brune
(Explaining the reason for reading the transcript of the July 15th conference call.)
DOJ-OGR-00009357.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,363 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 1616-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 68 of 130
A-5753
A-5753
C2grdau2
Brune - direct
296
1 the Court.
2 Q. Do you think it was before the July 15th conference call
3 with the Court?
4 A. I did not see it before the July 15th conference call with
5 the Court.
6 Q. Do you think it was before you filed your July 21st letter?
7 A. Yes, it was.
8 Q. You were not on the July 15th conference call, correct?
9 A. That's correct.
10 Q. You saw a transcript of the conference call?
11 A. Ms. Trzaskoma let me know about it immediately after that,
12 and I also read the transcript when it became available.
13 Q. Approximately when was that? Was that before you filed
14 your July 21st letter?
15 A. Oh, yes, within a day.
16 Q. You're accustomed to get daily or -- in other words, this
17 was not an instance where you ordered like a 30-day-out
18 transcript?
19 A. Oh, no. We had to respond, so I read the transcript to
20 make sure that I knew what Judge Pauley was directing us to do.
21 Q. At the point at which you saw those emails, Ms. Brune, at
22 the very least you knew that Ms. Trzaskoma's statements to the
23 Court in that conference call were not correct?
24 A. I disagree.
25 Q. Did she reveal to the Court what she knew?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
Brune - direct
296
1 the Court.
2 Q. Do you think it was before the July 15th conference call
3 with the Court?
4 A. I did not see it before the July 15th conference call with
5 the Court.
6 Q. Do you think it was before you filed your July 21st letter?
7 A. Yes, it was.
8 Q. You were not on the July 15th conference call, correct?
9 A. That's correct.
10 Q. You saw a transcript of the conference call?
11 A. Ms. Trzaskoma let me know about it immediately after that,
12 and I also read the transcript when it became available.
13 Q. Approximately when was that? Was that before you filed
14 your July 21st letter?
15 A. Oh, yes, within a day.
16 Q. You're accustomed to get daily or -- in other words, this
17 was not an instance where you ordered like a 30-day-out
18 transcript?
19 A. Oh, no. We had to respond, so I read the transcript to
20 make sure that I knew what Judge Pauley was directing us to do.
21 Q. At the point at which you saw those emails, Ms. Brune, at
22 the very least you knew that Ms. Trzaskoma's statements to the
23 Court in that conference call were not correct?
24 A. I disagree.
25 Q. Did she reveal to the Court what she knew?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009357
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document