DOJ-OGR-00009368.jpg
436 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
436 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding where a witness named Brune is under direct examination. Brune denies meeting with Ms. Trzaskoma and Ms. Edelstein specifically to prepare for the hearing but confirms they collaborated extensively on a July 21st letter to accurately reconstruct events. The questioning focuses on the extent of their communication and preparation regarding the issues before the judge.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness |
The individual being questioned in the transcript, under direct examination.
|
| Ms. Trzaskoma |
Mentioned as someone who had an initial thought about an issue and with whom the witness (Brune) worked on a letter a...
|
|
| Ms. Edelstein |
Mentioned as someone the witness (Brune) met with prior to the hearing.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript, likely the court reporting agency that created the document.
|
Timeline (3 events)
A legal hearing for which the witness, Brune, is being questioned. The witness denies meeting with Ms. Trzaskoma and Ms. Edelstein specifically in preparation for this hearing.
The witness (Brune) confirms having talked with Ms. Trzaskoma and Ms. Edelstein on many occasions about the issues before the judge.
The witness (Brune) states they worked very hard with Ms. Trzaskoma and Ms. Edelstein on the July 21st letter to accurately reconstruct what had happened.
Relationships (2)
The document states they worked together on a July 21st letter and talked on many occasions about issues related to a hearing.
The document states they worked together on a July 21st letter and talked about issues related to a hearing.
Key Quotes (3)
"No, because the July 21st letter lays it out, lays it out accurately, including the fact that Ms. Trzaskoma had the initial thought that it was one and the same."Source
— Brune
(Responding to a question about whether certain documents would advance the government's position on a waiver issue.)
DOJ-OGR-00009368.jpg
Quote #1
"Never. What I'm saying is I've talked about the issues with them. We worked very hard on the July 21st letter to try to get it accurate, but we did not meet in preparation for this hearing."Source
— Brune
(Answering how many times they met with Ms. Trzaskoma and Ms. Edelstein to discuss the hearing.)
DOJ-OGR-00009368.jpg
Quote #2
"I think that they know what my recollection is, and I think I know what their recollection is, because we worked so hard on the letter to reconstruct what had happened."Source
— Brune
(Responding to a question about whether they discussed what their answers would be for the hearing.)
DOJ-OGR-00009368.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,438 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 616-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 79 of 130
A-5764
A-5764
C2grdau2
Brune - direct
307
1 doctrine protection for the work we had done.
2 Q. You knew that those documents would significantly advance
3 the government's position on the waiver issue, correct?
4 A. No, because the July 21st letter lays it out, lays it out
5 accurately, including the fact that Ms. Trzaskoma had the
6 initial thought that it was one and the same.
7 Q. Are you referring to the "Jesus, I do think that it's her"
8 email?
9 A. Yes.
10 Q. You met with Ms. Trzaskoma and Ms. Edelstein prior to this
11 hearing, correct?
12 A. We worked together. I've certainly talked with her on many
13 occasions about the issues that are before the judge in this
14 hearing. I'm testifying from my own best recollection, but
15 I've certainly talked with them about the issues.
16 Q. How many times did you meet with them to discuss this
17 hearing?
18 A. Never. What I'm saying is I've talked about the issues
19 with them. We worked very hard on the July 21st letter to try
20 to get it accurate, but we did not meet in preparation for this
21 hearing.
22 Q. So, you didn't discuss what your answers would be?
23 A. I think that they know what my recollection is, and I think
24 I know what their recollection is, because we worked so hard on
25 the letter to reconstruct what had happened.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
Brune - direct
307
1 doctrine protection for the work we had done.
2 Q. You knew that those documents would significantly advance
3 the government's position on the waiver issue, correct?
4 A. No, because the July 21st letter lays it out, lays it out
5 accurately, including the fact that Ms. Trzaskoma had the
6 initial thought that it was one and the same.
7 Q. Are you referring to the "Jesus, I do think that it's her"
8 email?
9 A. Yes.
10 Q. You met with Ms. Trzaskoma and Ms. Edelstein prior to this
11 hearing, correct?
12 A. We worked together. I've certainly talked with her on many
13 occasions about the issues that are before the judge in this
14 hearing. I'm testifying from my own best recollection, but
15 I've certainly talked with them about the issues.
16 Q. How many times did you meet with them to discuss this
17 hearing?
18 A. Never. What I'm saying is I've talked about the issues
19 with them. We worked very hard on the July 21st letter to try
20 to get it accurate, but we did not meet in preparation for this
21 hearing.
22 Q. So, you didn't discuss what your answers would be?
23 A. I think that they know what my recollection is, and I think
24 I know what their recollection is, because we worked so hard on
25 the letter to reconstruct what had happened.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009368
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document