DOJ-OGR-00016884.jpg
578 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
578 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between counsel and the judge regarding the need to establish a person's residency at 44 Kinnerton. Counsel mentions a potential new witness, Mr. Moran, and the judge rules that property ownership documents are admissible as evidence to argue the inference of residency.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Moran |
Mentioned as a person who was found to potentially establish someone's residency at 44 Kinnerton.
|
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Counsel/Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, addressing the Court.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Title used to address the judge presiding over the case.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | government agency |
A speaker in the transcript, representing the judiciary.
|
| the government | government agency |
Mentioned as a party in the case that moved to preclude ownership documents.
|
| the defense | legal party |
Mentioned as a party in the case that intended to establish timing of residence.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript, likely the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A legal proceeding where counsel and the judge discuss the introduction of a new witness and the admissibility of ownership documents to infer residency.
Courtroom (implied)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
A property where residency and ownership are being discussed.
|
|
|
The location of property for which ownership documents were moved to be precluded.
|
Relationships (1)
MR. EVERDELL is an attorney arguing a point before THE COURT (the judge) in a formal legal proceeding.
Key Quotes (3)
"The government moved to preclude the ownership documents on Kinnerton."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge is stating the government's previous legal motion regarding the evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00016884.jpg
Quote #1
"I'm letting it in because I think you persuaded me that you can argue the inference of residence from ownership."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge is explaining the ruling to allow the ownership documents as evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00016884.jpg
Quote #2
"Just -- all along, I gather that was what the defense intended to do, to establish timing of residence;"Source
— THE COURT
(The judge is stating their understanding of the defense's strategy.)
DOJ-OGR-00016884.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,413 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 155 of 197
LCHCmax5
LCHCmax5
the last day or two that we knew this about this person. And we actually had to confirm that he had relevant information before I proffered him as a witness in this case. And now we've been able to do that and that's the one when, yesterday, at the end of the day, I told the Court that we may have one additional witness, that's who I was referring to.
Your Honor, actually, I'm sorry. It was yesterday because this issue came up after the property issue was discussed earlier in the day, and we felt like we had to find somebody who could establish her residency at 44 Kinnerton instead of not just her ownership. We were able to find Mr. Moran.
THE COURT: I mean, again, I find it amusing, somehow. The government moved to preclude the ownership documents on Kinnerton.
MR. EVERDELL: I understand the Court's ruling and if that's the basis --
THE COURT: I'm letting it in. I'm letting it. I queried the relevance of it because it was ownership, not residence, but I'm letting it in because I think you persuaded me that you can argue the inference of residence from ownership.
MR. EVERDELL: And, your Honor -- I'm sorry.
THE COURT: Just -- all along, I gather that was what the defense intended to do, to establish timing of residence;
Your Honor, actually, I'm sorry. It was yesterday because this issue came up after the property issue was discussed earlier in the day, and we felt like we had to find somebody who could establish her residency at 44 Kinnerton instead of not just her ownership. We were able to find Mr. Moran.
THE COURT: I mean, again, I find it amusing, somehow. The government moved to preclude the ownership documents on Kinnerton.
MR. EVERDELL: I understand the Court's ruling and if that's the basis --
THE COURT: I'm letting it in. I'm letting it. I queried the relevance of it because it was ownership, not residence, but I'm letting it in because I think you persuaded me that you can argue the inference of residence from ownership.
MR. EVERDELL: And, your Honor -- I'm sorry.
THE COURT: Just -- all along, I gather that was what the defense intended to do, to establish timing of residence;
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016884
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document