This document appears to be page 18 of a book or essay titled 'Hardwired for Hope?', included in a House Oversight evidence file. The text discusses a psychological study on memory and optimism, referencing the September 11, 2001 attacks as a catalyst for the author's research into how memory reconstruction relates to imagining the future. It notes that memories of 9/11 were often inaccurate 11 months later, and posits that the memory system evolved to help construct future scenarios rather than perfectly record the past.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Author (Unnamed) | Narrator/Researcher |
Writing in first person ('I') about their research on optimism and memory.
|
| Volunteers | Study Participants |
Subjects whose brain activity was recorded by the author.
|
| Scientists | Researchers |
General group of memory researchers referenced by the author.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Indicated by the footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where the author lived during the Sept. 11 attacks.
|
"The reality is that I stumbled onto the brain's innate optimism by accident."Source
"I was intrigued by the fact that people felt their memories were as accurate as a videotape, while often they were filled with errors."Source
"The core function of the memory system could in fact be to imagine the future — to enable us to prepare for what has yet to come."Source
"Mundane scenes brightened with upbeat details as if polished by a Hollywood script"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,036 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document