An email thread from September 2020 regarding the setup of a Relativity database for the 'US v. Epstein' case. The correspondence details the creation of specific review tags for legal documents, including categories for 'Witness Statement', 'Potential Brady' material, 'Hot Doc', and various confidentiality designations.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| [Redacted Sender 1] | Litigation Support / Database Administrator |
Confirmed creation of database tags and batches.
|
| [Redacted Sender 2] | Legal Team Member / Reviewer |
Requested specific tags for document review in the US v. Epstein database.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Relativity |
Database platform used for document review
|
|
| US Government / Department of Justice |
Implied by case name 'US v. Epstein'
|
"We would like to use several tags as we conduct our review of documents in the “US v Epstein” database on Relativity."Source
"Potential Brady"Source
"Work Product (Do Not Produce)"Source
"Witness Statement"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,009 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document