DOJ-OGR-00013269.jpg
563 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
563 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between counsel (Ms. Moe) and the judge (The Court). Ms. Moe provides an update on the trial, stating they expect to rest their case within the week. The judge acknowledges this and then discusses a personal scheduling conflict, proposing alternative dates for the charging conference to both Ms. Moe and the defense counsel.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MOE | Counsel |
Speaking with the Court about scheduling and providing an update on the trial's timing.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, making a ruling on a document to be filed under seal, and discussing scheduling for the c...
|
| defense counsel | Counsel |
Mentioned by the Court when discussing scheduling options for the charging conference.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion in court regarding the scheduling of a trial and a charging conference. The Court ruled on a request to file a document under seal.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (2)
Ms. Moe addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and provides a professional update on the trial's progress. The Court responds formally to discuss scheduling matters.
The Court addresses defense counsel directly to propose scheduling options for a charging conference.
Key Quotes (3)
"I'll permit it to be maintained under seal if you do share it with the Court."Source
— THE COURT
(Ruling on a request to file a document under seal that contains names of individuals testifying under pseudonym or who have not yet testified.)
DOJ-OGR-00013269.jpg
Quote #1
"Your Honor, with respect to scheduling, we did want to update the Court and counsel that we do anticipate that, given the current pace of scheduling, we will rest this week."Source
— MS. MOE
(Informing the Court about the estimated timeline for concluding their part of the trial.)
DOJ-OGR-00013269.jpg
Quote #2
"Let me ask defense counsel, in light of that and in light of the fact that I'm, due to a scheduling conflict, not sitting 13th, 14th, 15th -- let me run this as an option."Source
— THE COURT
(Proposing a scheduling alternative for the charging conference due to a personal scheduling conflict.)
DOJ-OGR-00013269.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,441 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 256 of 264 1697
LC7Cmax8
LC7Cmax8
1 that with a request to file it under seal on the theory that
2 it's not a judicial document, as I'm not doing anything with
3 it, and even if it is a judicial document, it contains the
4 names, it's identifying as to individuals who are testifying
5 under pseudonym and individuals who haven't testified yet. For
6 that reason, I'll permit it to be maintained under seal if you
7 do share it with the Court.
8 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.
9 With respect to scheduling -- I'm sorry, may I have
10 just one moment?
11 THE COURT: Yes.
12 MS. MOE: Your Honor, with respect to scheduling, we
13 did want to update the Court and counsel that we do anticipate
14 that, given the current pace of scheduling, we will rest this
15 week. So we want to let the Court know that, for scheduling
16 purposes, giving the timing of the trial, that's our current
17 update and estimate.
18 THE COURT: That's helpful. I wanted to talk about
19 the timing of the charging conference.
20 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
21 THE COURT: Let me just pull up my calendar.
22 Let me ask defense counsel, in light of that and in
23 light of the fact that I'm, due to a scheduling conflict, not
24 sitting 13th, 14th, 15th -- let me run this as an option. I
25 have inquired whether we can hold the charging conference on
2 it's not a judicial document, as I'm not doing anything with
3 it, and even if it is a judicial document, it contains the
4 names, it's identifying as to individuals who are testifying
5 under pseudonym and individuals who haven't testified yet. For
6 that reason, I'll permit it to be maintained under seal if you
7 do share it with the Court.
8 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.
9 With respect to scheduling -- I'm sorry, may I have
10 just one moment?
11 THE COURT: Yes.
12 MS. MOE: Your Honor, with respect to scheduling, we
13 did want to update the Court and counsel that we do anticipate
14 that, given the current pace of scheduling, we will rest this
15 week. So we want to let the Court know that, for scheduling
16 purposes, giving the timing of the trial, that's our current
17 update and estimate.
18 THE COURT: That's helpful. I wanted to talk about
19 the timing of the charging conference.
20 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
21 THE COURT: Let me just pull up my calendar.
22 Let me ask defense counsel, in light of that and in
23 light of the fact that I'm, due to a scheduling conflict, not
24 sitting 13th, 14th, 15th -- let me run this as an option. I
25 have inquired whether we can hold the charging conference on
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013269
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document