HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031730.jpg
1.41 MB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
1.41 MB
Summary
This document is an email chain from April 16, 2014, between Dan Christensen and attorney Tonja Haddad Coleman. The discussion centers on an unnamed officer's role in verifying an affidavit; Coleman argues the officer acted merely as a notary verifying identity, not the truthfulness of the document's contents. Christensen also asks about Coleman's flight schedule.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Dan Christensen | Journalist/Sender |
Asking questions regarding an affidavit and an individual's flight schedule.
|
| Tonja Haddad Coleman | Attorney |
Responding to inquiries about legal procedures regarding affidavits and notarization by officers.
|
| Unnamed Officer ('He') | Subject of discussion |
An individual who verified an affidavit 'like a notary' but allegedly did not read it or swear to its contents.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Tonja Haddad, P.A. |
Law firm of Tonja Haddad Coleman
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031730'
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
|
Office address of Tonja Haddad Coleman
|
Relationships (1)
Email correspondence where Christensen is questioning Coleman about a legal matter.
Key Quotes (3)
"He verified the affidavit- like a notary- verifying/swearing to only the fact that the officer who filled it out and signed it was who he purports to be."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031730.jpg
Quote #1
"he is not swearing to the contents of the document or their veracity- just like any other notary."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031730.jpg
Quote #2
"He did not- he isn't required to."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031730.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,280 characters)
Please add this efiling address to all pleadings: [REDACTED]
The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
From: DAN CHRISTENSEN [mailto:[REDACTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 1:09 PM
To: Tonja Haddad Coleman
Subject: Re:
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 1:09 PM
To: Tonja Haddad Coleman
Subject: Re:
when's your flight?
From: Tonja Haddad Coleman <[REDACTED]>
Date: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 at 1:07 PM
To: DAN CHRISTENSEN <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE:
Date: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 at 1:07 PM
To: DAN CHRISTENSEN <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE:
He did not- he isn't required to.
Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq.
Tonja Haddad, P.A.
Advocate Building
315 SE 7th Street
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
[REDACTED] facsimile
www.tonjahaddad.com
Tonja Haddad, P.A.
Advocate Building
315 SE 7th Street
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
[REDACTED] facsimile
www.tonjahaddad.com
Please add this efiling address to all pleadings: [REDACTED]
The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
From: DAN CHRISTENSEN [mailto:[REDACTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 1:07 PM
To: Tonja Haddad Coleman
Subject: Re:
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 1:07 PM
To: Tonja Haddad Coleman
Subject: Re:
So he didn't read the affidavit?
From: Tonja Haddad Coleman <[REDACTED]>
Date: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 at 12:41 PM
To: DAN CHRISTENSEN <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE:
Date: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 at 12:41 PM
To: DAN CHRISTENSEN <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE:
He verified the affidavit- like a notary- verifying/swearing to only the fact that the officer who filled it out and signed it was who he purports to be. When an officer does that for the officer drafting the document that is all he is doing- he is not swearing to the contents of the document or their veracity- just like any other notary. Make sense?
Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq.
Tonja Haddad, P.A.
Advocate Building
Tonja Haddad, P.A.
Advocate Building
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031730
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document