HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033367.jpg

Extraction Summary

3
People
4
Organizations
5
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: News article printout / legal discovery document
File Size:
Summary

This document is page 3 of a printout of a New York Times opinion article dated May 29, 2019, authored by former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd. The text analyzes the trade war between the Trump administration and China, discussing nationalism and negotiating strategies. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033367' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee, likely as an attachment to an email or file in a larger investigation, though the specific connection to Epstein is not contained in the text of this specific page.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Kevin Rudd Author / Former Prime Minister of Australia / President of Asia Society Policy Institute
Author of the opinion piece regarding US-China trade relations.
Donald Trump U.S. President (referenced)
Mentioned in the context of the 'Trump administration' and 'Trump's America' regarding trade strategy.
Xi Jinping President of China (referenced)
Mentioned in the context of 'Xi Jinping's China' and rising nationalism.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
The New York Times
Publisher of the article.
Asia Society Policy Institute
Organization where Kevin Rudd serves as president.
Trump Administration
Government entity discussed in the article.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033367'.

Locations (5)

Location Context
Subject of the trade war discussion.
Subject of the trade war discussion.
Referenced regarding the Chinese government's viewpoint.
Location of the Asia Society Policy Institute.
Referenced in Kevin Rudd's bio.

Relationships (1)

Kevin Rudd... is president of the Asia Society Policy Institute in New York.

Key Quotes (3)

"If that’s what the Trump administration wants, its strategy has been a great success."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033367.jpg
Quote #1
"The bottom line is that nationalism is not just a factor in Trump’s America. It’s now a big factor in Xi Jinping’s China as well, reinforced through the prism of Chinese history."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033367.jpg
Quote #2
"Today, in Beijing’s view, China is weak no longer."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033367.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,655 characters)

5/29/2019 Opinion | Trump Hands China an Easy Win in the Trade War - The New York Times
If that’s what the Trump administration wants, its strategy has been a great success. If not, and the president really wants a trade deal, with reasonable decreases in the bilateral trade deficit, and some substantive changes in Chinese economic behavior, the American negotiating strategy requires some serious recalibration.
Of course, China’s public position is that negotiations can continue. Even within the framework of the new “red lines,” there may still be room for a deal. China might agree to purchase more American goods, with America yielding on the retention of tariffs, and the unilateral right to impose tariffs later. However, the degree of difficulty in getting to an agreement has now increased substantially.
The bottom line is that nationalism is not just a factor in Trump’s America. It’s now a big factor in Xi Jinping’s China as well, reinforced through the prism of Chinese history. In most of its dealings with America over the last 100 years, China has seen itself as weak. Today, in Beijing’s view, China is weak no longer.
Kevin Rudd, a former prime minister of Australia, is president of the Asia Society Policy Institute in New York.
The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.
Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/29/opinion/trump-china-trade-war.html 3/3
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033367

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document