DOJ-OGR-00010007.jpg

441 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 441 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (filed August 24, 2022) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Brune. The testimony concerns the due diligence performed during jury selection (voir dire), specifically admitting that the witness did not launch a full-scale private investigation into every juror and confirming that the investigative entity 'Nardello' did not search for juror Catherine M. Conrad of Bronxville. The witness also discusses the timing of when the government disclosed a letter sent by the juror.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Brune Witness
Testifying under direct examination regarding jury selection due diligence.
Ms. Trzaskoma Attorney/Colleague
Mentioned as someone who might have had the middle initial of the juror; worked with Brune.
Catherine Conrad Juror
Subject of the inquiry; specifically identified as 'Catherine M. Conrad of Bronxville'.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Nardello
Private investigative firm or entity that did not search Catherine Conrad.
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting agency.
The Government
Prosecution; received a letter from the juror and disclosed it three weeks later.

Timeline (2 events)

2022-08-24
Document Filing
Court Docket
Unknown
Voir Dire
Court
Brune Jurors

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location associated with juror Catherine M. Conrad.
Jurisdiction of the court (implied SDNY).

Relationships (2)

Brune Professional/Legal Team Ms. Trzaskoma
Brune refers to 'the firm' having the middle initial when asked about Trzaskoma.
Nardello Investigator/Subject Catherine Conrad
Testimony confirms Nardello did not search Catherine Conrad.

Key Quotes (3)

"My primary method of narrowing the information was to listen to the sworn testimony on voir dire."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010007.jpg
Quote #1
"Nardello did not search Catherine Conrad, correct? A. That's so."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010007.jpg
Quote #2
"You had a Catherine M. Conrad of Bronxville, that was what was on the juror list, correct? A. That's my understanding now."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010007.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,460 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 646-2 Filed 08/24/22 Page 89 of 130
A-5724
267
C2GFDAU1 Brune - direct
1 A. My primary method of narrowing the information was to
2 listen to the sworn testimony on voir dire. But certainly if
3 what your question is could I have launched some kind of full
4 scale private investigative effort on each member of the voir
5 dire or each seated juror, I did not do that.
6 Q. Did you even ask Ms. Trzaskoma what was the middle initial?
7 Because you had a middle initial, correct?
8 A. I did not ask that question.
9 Q. That would have been one way to narrow down the
10 information, correct?
11 A. You know, when you say you had the middle initial, I'm
12 answering the firm had the middle initial. As to whether Ms.
13 Trzaskoma was focusing on the middle initial at that point, I
14 don't know, but I did not focus on the middle initial until
15 after the juror sent her letter to the government and then
16 three weeks later the government disclosed it to us.
17 Q. Well, when you're asking -- I mean, I think you said that
18 Nardello did not search Catherine Conrad, correct?
19 A. That's so.
20 Q. You had a Catherine M. Conrad of Bronxville, that was what
21 was on the juror list, correct?
22 A. That's my understanding now.
23 Q. And in voir dire you understood going into, before it ever
24 started, what the process is all about, correct?
25 A. I did.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010007

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document