This document is a page from a court transcript (filed August 24, 2022) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Brune. The testimony concerns the due diligence performed during jury selection (voir dire), specifically admitting that the witness did not launch a full-scale private investigation into every juror and confirming that the investigative entity 'Nardello' did not search for juror Catherine M. Conrad of Bronxville. The witness also discusses the timing of when the government disclosed a letter sent by the juror.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness |
Testifying under direct examination regarding jury selection due diligence.
|
| Ms. Trzaskoma | Attorney/Colleague |
Mentioned as someone who might have had the middle initial of the juror; worked with Brune.
|
| Catherine Conrad | Juror |
Subject of the inquiry; specifically identified as 'Catherine M. Conrad of Bronxville'.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Nardello |
Private investigative firm or entity that did not search Catherine Conrad.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency.
|
|
| The Government |
Prosecution; received a letter from the juror and disclosed it three weeks later.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location associated with juror Catherine M. Conrad.
|
|
|
Jurisdiction of the court (implied SDNY).
|
"My primary method of narrowing the information was to listen to the sworn testimony on voir dire."Source
"Nardello did not search Catherine Conrad, correct? A. That's so."Source
"You had a Catherine M. Conrad of Bronxville, that was what was on the juror list, correct? A. That's my understanding now."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,460 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document