This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between the judge and counsel for the government (Mr. Rohrbach) and an opposing party (Ms. Menninger). Mr. Rohrbach confirms that the government will not question a witness, Mr. Flatley, about 'CDs' during direct examination, which resolves a procedural issue and satisfies the court and Ms. Menninger. The judge remarks that prior preparation for this line of questioning is now moot but may be saved for future use.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Counsel |
A speaker in the court transcript, representing the government's position.
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Counsel |
Mentioned by Mr. Rohrbach as someone he needs to confer with, likely part of the government's legal team.
|
| Mr. Flatley | Witness |
The subject of the discussion, a person who is to be questioned in court.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in the transcript, presiding over the proceedings and addressed as 'your Honor'.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Counsel |
A speaker in the court transcript, likely representing the opposing party, who agrees with the proposed course of act...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Appears at the bottom of the document as the court reporting service.
|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned multiple times as a party in the legal proceeding, represented by Mr. Rohrbach.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.'
|
"Your Honor, the government is not planning to talk with Mr. Flatley on direct about CDs."Source
"So if you're not going to ask about CDs on direct, if he's not crossed on CDs, that's the end of the matter."Source
"Well, it sounds like all that work we did on Flatley last night will just go in the can for future use."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,295 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document