This document is page 72 of a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features a dialogue between the Court and a witness (Rocchio) regarding the forensic analysis of grooming. The witness explains that while prior sexual abuse increases vulnerability to subsequent abuse, that history alone does not determine whether grooming occurred in a specific instance.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rocchio | Witness |
Testifying on direct examination regarding grooming and victimization analysis.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Questioning the witness for clarification on the relevance of prior sexual abuse history.
|
| The Witness | Testifier |
Answering the Court's questions regarding forensic analysis of grooming.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR)
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY) based on case number format and reporters.
|
"It's relevant in that I know that prior victimization could increase vulnerability"Source
"Vulnerability to subsequent sexual abuse."Source
"But that prior victimization and vulnerability isn't going to tell me whether or not it happened here."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,598 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document