DOJ-OGR-00010116.jpg
381 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
4
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
381 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from March 22, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named Berke by attorney Mr. Shechtman. The questioning centers on why Berke did not further investigate a potential name match between Juror No. 1 and a suspended lawyer, Catherine Conrad, with Berke stating it was concluded they were different people based on the voir dire. After the examination, the witness is excused, and the court asks if the defense, representing a defendant named Parse, has any more witnesses.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Berke | Witness |
The witness being questioned during a redirect examination.
|
| Mr. Shechtman | Attorney |
The attorney conducting the redirect examination and representing the defendant.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the legal proceedings, addressing the attorneys and the witness.
|
| Ms. Brune |
Mentioned as the person who informed the witness Berke about a suspended lawyer named Catherine Conrad.
|
|
| Catherine Conrad | Suspended lawyer |
A suspended lawyer whose name was the same as Juror No. 1.
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
A juror whose name was the same as a suspended lawyer, Catherine Conrad.
|
| Mr. Okula | Attorney |
An attorney present in the court who declines to ask further questions.
|
| Parse | Defendant |
The defendant in the case, mentioned when the court asks if there are more witnesses to call.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-03-22
Redirect examination of witness Berke by attorney Mr. Shechtman, followed by the witness being excused.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (4)
Mr. Shechtman is an attorney conducting a redirect examination of Berke, who is a witness in the case.
The Court (Judge) is presiding over the proceedings and directing the attorney, Mr. Shechtman.
Ms. Brune provided information to Berke regarding a potential issue with a juror, suggesting a professional or investigative relationship.
Mr. Shechtman is the attorney for the defendant, Parse.
Key Quotes (4)
"You were told by Ms. Brune that there was a suspended lawyer with the name Catherine Conrad which was the same as Juror No. 1?"Source
— Mr. Shechtman
(Questioning the witness Berke during redirect examination.)
DOJ-OGR-00010116.jpg
Quote #1
"That's because you agreed with her that based on the voir dire, this couldn't be the same person?"Source
— Mr. Shechtman
(Following up on why the witness did not conduct further investigation.)
DOJ-OGR-00010116.jpg
Quote #2
"Mr. Berke, you're excused. You may step down."Source
— The Court
(Dismissing the witness after the examination is complete.)
DOJ-OGR-00010116.jpg
Quote #3
"Mr. Shechtman, does the defendant Parse have any additional witnesses to call?"Source
— The Court
(Asking the defense attorney if they will be calling more witnesses.)
DOJ-OGR-00010116.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,086 characters)
Case 1:20-cv-00383-PAE-SN Document 164-3-20 Filed 03/22/22 Page 816 of 1717
A-5833
A-5833
C2grdau4
Berke - redirect
376
Berke - redirect
376
1 MR. SHECHTMAN: I do.
2 THE COURT: Mr. Shechtman.
3 REDIRECT EXAMINATION
4 BY MR. SHECHTMAN:
5 Q. You were told by Ms. Brune that there was a suspended
6 lawyer with the name Catherine Conrad which was the same as
7 Juror No. 1?
8 A. That is correct.
9 Q. And you didn't do any further investigation?
10 A. I did not.
11 Q. That's because you agreed with her that based on the voir
12 dire, this couldn't be the same person?
13 A. Exactly.
14 MR. SHECHTMAN: No further questions.
15 THE COURT: Anything further?
16 MR. OKULA: No, your Honor. Thank you.
17 THE COURT: Mr. Berke, you're excused. You may step
18 down.
19 THE WITNESS: Thank you, Judge.
20 (Witness excused)
21 THE COURT: You're still talking as fast as ever.
22 THE WITNESS: I made a promise I wanted to keep.
23 THE COURT: Mr. Shechtman, does the defendant Parse
24 have any additional witnesses to call?
25 MR. SHECHTMAN: No, your Honor.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
2 THE COURT: Mr. Shechtman.
3 REDIRECT EXAMINATION
4 BY MR. SHECHTMAN:
5 Q. You were told by Ms. Brune that there was a suspended
6 lawyer with the name Catherine Conrad which was the same as
7 Juror No. 1?
8 A. That is correct.
9 Q. And you didn't do any further investigation?
10 A. I did not.
11 Q. That's because you agreed with her that based on the voir
12 dire, this couldn't be the same person?
13 A. Exactly.
14 MR. SHECHTMAN: No further questions.
15 THE COURT: Anything further?
16 MR. OKULA: No, your Honor. Thank you.
17 THE COURT: Mr. Berke, you're excused. You may step
18 down.
19 THE WITNESS: Thank you, Judge.
20 (Witness excused)
21 THE COURT: You're still talking as fast as ever.
22 THE WITNESS: I made a promise I wanted to keep.
23 THE COURT: Mr. Shechtman, does the defendant Parse
24 have any additional witnesses to call?
25 MR. SHECHTMAN: No, your Honor.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010116
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document