HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023524.jpg
593 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Document excerpt / congressional record
File Size:
593 KB
Summary
This document page (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023524) outlines a political dispute between Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Matt Brooks. The conflict centers on Wasserman Schultz's suggestion to remove support for Israel as an election issue, which Brooks characterized as a 'gag order.' The text mentions Wasserman Schultz's appointment as DNC chair by Mr. Obama.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Debbie Wasserman Schultz | Representative of Florida / Chairman of the Democratic Party |
Suggested agreeing not to make support for Israel an election issue.
|
| Mr. Obama | President (implied) |
Recently named Wasserman Schultz as chairman of the Democratic Party.
|
| Matt Brooks | Executive Director of the Republican group |
Objected to Wasserman Schultz's suggestion, accusing her of proposing a gag order.
|
Organizations (3)
Timeline (1 events)
Not specified
Partisan argument regarding making support for Israel an election issue.
Not specified
Relationships (2)
Mr. Obama recently named as chairman of the Democratic Party
Argument ensued; Brooks objected to Schultz's suggestion
Key Quotes (1)
"gag order"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023524.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (371 characters)
8
A partisan argument ensued after Representative Debbie Wasserman
Schultz of Florida, whom Mr. Obama recently named as chairman of
the Democratic Party, suggested they agree not to make support for
Israel an election issue. Matt Brooks, executive director of the
Republican group, objected, accusing her of proposing a “gag order.”
Schultz of Florida, whom Mr. Obama recently named as chairman of
the Democratic Party, suggested they agree not to make support for
Israel an election issue. Matt Brooks, executive director of the
Republican group, objected, accusing her of proposing a “gag order.”
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023524
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document