DOJ-OGR-00014763.jpg
625 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
625 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding, dated August 22, 2022, in which a judge overrules several objections. The objections concern evidence from a 2005 search of Epstein's Palm Beach residence indicating additional minor victims, the defendant's responsibility for these victims, and the inclusion of a victim impact statement from a person named Kate. The judge confirms that with certain redactions, the defense no longer objects to Kate's statement.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein |
Mentioned in relation to records from a 2005 search revealing that additional minors provided him with sexualized mas...
|
|
| Mr. Everdell |
Addressed by the speaker (likely a judge) regarding a continuing objection in paragraph 83.
|
|
| Kate | Victim |
Mentioned in relation to her victim impact statement and her status under the CVRA, which was the subject of an objec...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| probation department | government agency |
Mentioned as having adopted the government's suggestion to revise a paragraph concerning the defendant's responsibili...
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the document, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2022-08-22
A hearing where a judge is ruling on objections related to paragraphs in a legal document.
Mr. Everdell
unnamed speaker (judge)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of a 2005 search where records were recovered.
|
Relationships (3)
The document states that records reveal 'additional minors provided Epstein with sexualized massages between 2001 and 2004.'
The document discusses 'Kate's victim impact statement', indicating she is a victim of the defendant's actions.
The speaker, acting in a judicial capacity, directly addresses Mr. Everdell regarding legal objections during a proceeding.
Key Quotes (3)
"Again, I overrule the objection."Source
— unnamed speaker (judge)
(The speaker's ruling on the objection to paragraph 82, concerning evidence of additional minors providing massages to Epstein.)
DOJ-OGR-00014763.jpg
Quote #1
"To the extent there is a continuing objection, I overrule it for the reasons stated regarding paragraphs 27 and 28."Source
— unnamed speaker (judge)
(The speaker's ruling on the objection to the revised paragraph 83, concerning the defendant's responsibility for victimizing additional minors.)
DOJ-OGR-00014763.jpg
Quote #2
"Do I have that right?"Source
— unnamed speaker (judge)
(The speaker seeking confirmation from the defense that they no longer object to Kate making a statement, provided certain redactions are made.)
DOJ-OGR-00014763.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,504 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 779 Filed 08/22/22 Page 16 of 101
M6SQmax1
M6SQmax1
in the abuse of these individuals.
Paragraph 82, the objection is to the assertion that
the records recovered from the Palm Beach residence during the
2005 search reveal that additional minors provided Epstein with
sexualized massages between 2001 and 2004. Again, I overrule
the objection. The trial record including message pads, phone
book entries, and testimony of witnesses establishes by a
preponderance that the information contained in this paragraph
is accurate.
the records recovered from the Palm Beach residence during the
2005 search reveal that additional minors provided Epstein with
sexualized massages between 2001 and 2004. Again, I overrule
the objection. The trial record including message pads, phone
book entries, and testimony of witnesses establishes by a
preponderance that the information contained in this paragraph
is accurate.
Paragraph 83, so there was a revision here. I'm not
sure if there is a continuing objection, Mr. Everdell. The
previous objection was to the assertion that the defendant is
responsible for the victimization of untold number of other
victims. The probation department adopted the government's
suggestion, revised the paragraph to assert that the defendant
is responsible for the victimization of additional minor
victims. To the extent there is a continuing objection, I
overrule it for the reasons stated regarding paragraphs 27 and
28.
sure if there is a continuing objection, Mr. Everdell. The
previous objection was to the assertion that the defendant is
responsible for the victimization of untold number of other
victims. The probation department adopted the government's
suggestion, revised the paragraph to assert that the defendant
is responsible for the victimization of additional minor
victims. To the extent there is a continuing objection, I
overrule it for the reasons stated regarding paragraphs 27 and
28.
Paragraph 85 is an objection to the inclusion of
Kate's victim impact statement and her status under the CVRA.
We have litigated the question of Kate's ability to make a
statement here. I believe that defense's ultimate position was
that with the requested redactions, there were no objections to
her making a statement. Do I have that right?
Kate's victim impact statement and her status under the CVRA.
We have litigated the question of Kate's ability to make a
statement here. I believe that defense's ultimate position was
that with the requested redactions, there were no objections to
her making a statement. Do I have that right?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
•
•
•
(212) 805-0300
•
•
•
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014763
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document