DOJ-OGR-00017953.jpg
559 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
559 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between attorney Mr. Pagliuca and the Judge regarding the admissibility of a question about 'hindsight bias phenomena' and victim blaming. The Judge rules that the proposed question is 'beyond the scope' of the direct examination.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney |
Arguing for the admissibility of a question regarding hindsight bias.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion, ruling the attorney's question as 'beyond the scope'.
|
| Unidentified Witness ('She') | Witness |
Mentioned by Pagliuca as the person basing her testimony on a specific article.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court filing date for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction implied by the court reporter's name (likely SDNY).
|
Relationships (1)
Attorney presenting arguments to the Judge in court.
Key Quotes (3)
"Isn't it true that hindsight bias phenomena could lead to blame of the victim's family or community from not preventing the abuse"Source
DOJ-OGR-00017953.jpg
Quote #1
"That sounds beyond the scope to me."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017953.jpg
Quote #2
"The question you asked is beyond the scope of the direct, unless you want to point me to testimony suggesting otherwise"Source
DOJ-OGR-00017953.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,377 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 80 of 228 756
LC2Qmax3
LC2Qmax3
1 THE COURT: What's the question?
2 MR. PAGLIUCA: The question will be: Isn't it true
3 that hindsight bias phenomena could lead to blame of the
4 victim's family or community from not preventing the abuse,
5 which is a direct quote out of article that she is basing her
6 testimony on.
7 THE COURT: I'm sorry. I don't have LiveNote. Can
8 you give that to me again?
9 MR. PAGLIUCA: The quote?
10 THE COURT: No, your question.
11 MR. PAGLIUCA: The question is: Isn't it true that
12 the hindsight bias phenomena can lead to blame to the victim's
13 family or community for not preventing the abuse?
14 THE COURT: That sounds beyond the scope to me.
15 MR. PAGLIUCA: Beyond the scope of an article --
16 THE COURT: I just started with the proposition is it
17 your theory that everything in an article disclosed suddenly is
18 within the scope of the direct, and you said no, rightly. So
19 that's why I asked for the question.
20 The question you asked is beyond the scope of the
21 direct, unless you want to point me to testimony suggesting
22 otherwise, other than the fact that it's in an article
23 disclosed.
24 If I would make everybody answer my first question,
25 it's the first question that gets me where I need to go.
2 MR. PAGLIUCA: The question will be: Isn't it true
3 that hindsight bias phenomena could lead to blame of the
4 victim's family or community from not preventing the abuse,
5 which is a direct quote out of article that she is basing her
6 testimony on.
7 THE COURT: I'm sorry. I don't have LiveNote. Can
8 you give that to me again?
9 MR. PAGLIUCA: The quote?
10 THE COURT: No, your question.
11 MR. PAGLIUCA: The question is: Isn't it true that
12 the hindsight bias phenomena can lead to blame to the victim's
13 family or community for not preventing the abuse?
14 THE COURT: That sounds beyond the scope to me.
15 MR. PAGLIUCA: Beyond the scope of an article --
16 THE COURT: I just started with the proposition is it
17 your theory that everything in an article disclosed suddenly is
18 within the scope of the direct, and you said no, rightly. So
19 that's why I asked for the question.
20 The question you asked is beyond the scope of the
21 direct, unless you want to point me to testimony suggesting
22 otherwise, other than the fact that it's in an article
23 disclosed.
24 If I would make everybody answer my first question,
25 it's the first question that gets me where I need to go.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017953
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document