DOJ-OGR-00002337(1).jpg

971 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
5
Organizations
6
Locations
5
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 971 KB
Summary

This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated February 1, 2021, regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The government responds to Maxwell's request for expanded laptop access to review discovery materials on weekends, stating it has no objection but ultimately defers to the Metropolitan Detention Center's (MDC) policies. The letter details the extensive access Maxwell has already been granted, including a dedicated laptop and desktop computer, arguing she has ample opportunity to review the evidence.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Alison J. Nathan Judge
The letter is addressed to 'The Honorable Alison J. Nathan' and refers to her as 'Judge Nathan'.
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
The case is 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell'. The letter refers to her as 'the defendant'.

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
U.S. Department of Justice government agency
Appears in the header of the document.
United States Attorney Southern District of New York government agency
The sender of the letter, as indicated in the letterhead.
United States District Court, Southern District of New York government agency
The recipient of the letter, where Judge Nathan presides.
Metropolitan Detention Center government agency
Referred to as 'MDC', it is the facility where the defendant is held and where discovery review takes place.
BOP government agency
Mentioned as the provider of a desktop computer ('BOP desktop computer') for the defendant's use.

Timeline (5 events)

2020-08
The Government made its first discovery production to the defendant.
Government Ghislaine Maxwell
2020-11-18
The Government hand delivered a laptop to the MDC for the defendant’s exclusive use in reviewing discovery.
Metropolitan Detention Center
Government
2021-01-15
The Court issued an order directing the MDC to permit the defendant to use a laptop to review discovery on weekends and holidays.
United States District Court, Southern District of New York
The Court
2021-01-25
The Court issued an order allowing parties to respond to a letter from MDC legal counsel.
United States District Court, Southern District of New York
The Court
2021-02-01
The Government filed this letter in response to a court order.
United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Locations (6)

Location Context
Part of the address for the United States Attorney's office.
The address of the United States Attorney's office for the Southern District of New York.
The location of the United States District Court.
The address of the United States Courthouse for the Southern District of New York.
The jurisdiction of the court and the US Attorney's office.
The facility where the defendant is detained.

Relationships (2)

United States Government adversarial (legal) Ghislaine Maxwell
The document outlines the legal case 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell' and discusses the government's response to the defendant's requests regarding discovery materials.
United States Government professional Metropolitan Detention Center
The Government states it 'defers to the MDC regarding how it manages its inmate population' and 'will continue to defer to the MDC here,' indicating a professional relationship where the Government respects the MDC's operational authority.

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,926 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 129 Filed 02/01/21 Page 1 of 2
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew’s Plaza
New York, New York 10007
February 1, 2021
BY ECF
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, New York 10007
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan:
The Government respectfully submits this letter in response to the Court’s January 25, 2021 order allowing the parties to respond to a letter from legal counsel at the Metropolitan Detention Center (“MDC”) also dated January 25, 2021. (Dkt. No. 117). In particular, MDC legal counsel asks the Court to vacate its January 15, 2021 order directing the MDC to permit the defendant to use a laptop to review discovery on weekends and holidays. While the Government has no objection to the defendant’s request for additional laptop access, the Government also generally defers to the MDC regarding how it manages its inmate population. The Government will continue to defer to the MDC here, particularly because the defendant has had ample access to discovery even without laptop access on weekends and holidays.
Given the volume of discovery in this case, which totals more than two million pages, the Government and the MDC have both made significant efforts to ensure that the defendant has extensive access to her discovery materials. Since the Government made its first discovery production in August 2020, the defendant has had exclusive access to a BOP desktop computer in the MDC on which to review her discovery. When the defendant complained of technical issues reviewing portions of her discovery on that desktop computer, the Government produced reformatted copies of discovery materials and instructions regarding how to open particular files. Because the defendant continued to complain that she was unable to review certain discovery files on the desktop computer, the Government agreed to provide a laptop for the defendant to use in her review of discovery. On November 18, 2020, the Government hand delivered the laptop to the MDC for the defendant’s exclusive use.
As the Court is aware, the defendant has received, and continues to receive more time to review her discovery than any other inmate at the MDC. In particular, the MDC permits the defendant to review discovery thirteen hours per day, seven days per week. On weekdays, the MDC permits the defendant to use the laptop during her thirteen hours of daily review time. On weekends and holidays, the MDC would ordinarily only allow the defendant to use the BOP desktop computer, which provides access to much of the discovery material. While, as noted above, the Government has no particular objection to the defendant’s request for weekend access
DOJ-OGR-00002337

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document