This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a discussion between the judge and an attorney, Ms. Moe, about admitting message books as evidence. The judge overrules an objection and indicates a preference for admitting the full books, which Ms. Moe agrees to. Following this exchange, the witness, Mrs. Hesse, is dismissed.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney (implied) |
A speaker in the transcript, arguing for the admission of evidence and interacting with the court.
|
| Mrs. Hesse | Witness |
Identified in the header ('Hesse - direct') and is dismissed by the court at the end of the exchange.
|
| THE COURT | Judge (implied) |
A speaker in the transcript, ruling on the admissibility of evidence and directing the proceedings.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| government | Government agency |
Mentioned by Ms. Moe: "Nothing from the government, your Honor."
|
"So I'll overrule the objection and I'll admit the -- well, you're seeking admission of the full message books with the ones you indicated or just the ones you indicated?"Source
"We're just offering the subsets of the marked exhibits that I read into the record."Source
"I would say part of my analysis depends on having reviewed the full set of books."Source
"Mrs. Hesse, you may take your seat. Thank you."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,427 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document