DOJ-OGR-00014722.jpg
613 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
613 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a dialogue between defense counsel, Mr. Everdell, and the Court. Mr. Everdell argues his interpretation of a recent note from the jury, contending that they are confused about whether they can convict his client, Ms. Maxwell, on Count Four based solely on events in New Mexico and are unclear on the jury instructions. The Court acknowledges his position but expresses skepticism about the assumptions being made.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. EVERDELL | Defense Counsel |
Speaking to the court, interpreting a note from the jury regarding the charges against Ms. Maxwell.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned as the person the jury is considering convicting on Count Four based on events in New Mexico.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, responding to Mr. Everdell's arguments.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion between defense counsel (Mr. Everdell) and the Court regarding a jury note and instructions during deliberations.
Courtroom
The jury is deliberating on the charges against Ms. Maxwell, specifically Count Four, and has sent a note to the court indicating confusion.
Jury
Ms. Maxwell
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the location of events related to the substantive offense in Count Four.
|
Relationships (1)
Mr. Everdell is speaking from the 'defense point of view' and making arguments to the court regarding the jury's potential conviction of 'Ms. Maxwell', indicating an attorney-client relationship.
Key Quotes (3)
"I think from the defense point of view, I think two things are very clear from this note. One is that the jury is considering whether or not they can convict Ms. Maxwell on the substantive offense in Count Four based solely on events that took place in New Mexico and traveled to and from New Mexico."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Arguing his interpretation of a jury note to the court.)
DOJ-OGR-00014722.jpg
Quote #1
"And I think the second point is that they are looking at the instructions that they have been given thus far because they reference the second element of Count Four. So they're looking at that instruction and they are unclear, they are confused by those instructions."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Continuing his argument about the jury's confusion based on their note.)
DOJ-OGR-00014722.jpg
Quote #2
"There are a number of assumptions in that that don't necessarily derive from the meaning of that letter, but I understand that is your position."Source
— THE COURT
(Responding to Mr. Everdell's interpretation of the jury's note.)
DOJ-OGR-00014722.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,758 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 775 Filed 08/10/22 Page 6 of 16 3152
LCSCMAXI
LCSCMAXI
1 request of the letter, but if I could make a brief record on
2 that, it will not take very long.
3 THE COURT: Okay. And so there is the record that you
4 made yesterday at the time the question came. There is the
5 record that you put in the letter this morning that came in
6 late -- early this morning that I reviewed this morning that we
7 just discussed. So, to the extent you're seeking a third bite
8 at the apple, go ahead.
9 MR. EVERDELL: I'm simply looking to fill out the
10 record. I understand it's been rejected by the Court.
11 I think from the defense point of view, I think two
12 things are very clear from this note. One is that the jury is
13 considering whether or not they can convict Ms. Maxwell on the
14 substantive offense in Count Four based solely on events that
15 took place in New Mexico and traveled to and from New Mexico.
16 THE COURT: There are a number of assumptions in that
17 that don't necessarily derive from the meaning of that letter,
18 but I understand that is your position.
19 MR. EVERDELL: Understood, your Honor.
20 And I think the second point is that they are looking
21 at the instructions that they have been given thus far because
22 they reference the second element of Count Four. So they're
23 looking at that instruction and they are unclear, they are
24 confused by those instructions. They are not sure whether or
25 not -- those instructions don't inform them that, in fact,
2 that, it will not take very long.
3 THE COURT: Okay. And so there is the record that you
4 made yesterday at the time the question came. There is the
5 record that you put in the letter this morning that came in
6 late -- early this morning that I reviewed this morning that we
7 just discussed. So, to the extent you're seeking a third bite
8 at the apple, go ahead.
9 MR. EVERDELL: I'm simply looking to fill out the
10 record. I understand it's been rejected by the Court.
11 I think from the defense point of view, I think two
12 things are very clear from this note. One is that the jury is
13 considering whether or not they can convict Ms. Maxwell on the
14 substantive offense in Count Four based solely on events that
15 took place in New Mexico and traveled to and from New Mexico.
16 THE COURT: There are a number of assumptions in that
17 that don't necessarily derive from the meaning of that letter,
18 but I understand that is your position.
19 MR. EVERDELL: Understood, your Honor.
20 And I think the second point is that they are looking
21 at the instructions that they have been given thus far because
22 they reference the second element of Count Four. So they're
23 looking at that instruction and they are unclear, they are
24 confused by those instructions. They are not sure whether or
25 not -- those instructions don't inform them that, in fact,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014722
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document