DOJ-OGR-00008347.jpg
516 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
516 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 10, 2021, detailing a legal discussion between two attorneys, Mr. Rohrbach and Mr. Everdell, and the judge. The conversation centers on the admissibility and relevance of evidence concerning sexual conduct in New Mexico to a federal conspiracy charge under the Mann Act, particularly in relation to New York's age of consent laws. The judge acknowledges the complexity and indicates the need for a legally correct jury charge.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, addressing the judge ('your Honor').
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the court transcript, presiding over the proceedings.
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, addressing the judge ('Your Honor').
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned by Mr. Everdell as the party raising a legal issue at the 'eleventh-hour'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-12-10
Legal arguments were presented regarding the relevance of sexual conduct in New Mexico to a conspiracy charge involving New York law and the Mann Act.
Courtroom
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned multiple times in relation to state law and where alleged sexual conduct occurred.
|
|
|
Mentioned in relation to its age of consent law and a potential violation.
|
Relationships (2)
Mr. Rohrbach addresses the judge as 'your Honor' and presents legal arguments in a formal court setting.
Mr. Everdell addresses the judge as 'Your Honor' and presents legal arguments in a formal court setting.
Key Quotes (3)
"I understand your point, which is whether or not it violated New Mexico law, that witness, in her telling, was under the age of consent in New York, and therefore it goes to the conspiracy to -- the Mann Act conspiracy count."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge summarizing an attorney's argument about the relevance of conduct in one state to a law concerning another.)
DOJ-OGR-00008347.jpg
Quote #1
"On the point about not being illegal under New Mexico law, this is really an eleventh-hour issue the government is raising."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(An attorney arguing that the prosecution has raised a new legal issue late in the proceedings.)
DOJ-OGR-00008347.jpg
Quote #2
"I will absorb this information and propose -- I do think a charge is necessary, but it has to be correct, and it sounds like it may not be entirely correct as written."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge considering the arguments and indicating a need to ensure any jury charge is legally correct.)
DOJ-OGR-00008347.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,352 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 536 Filed 12/10/21 Page 37 of 43 37
LBNAMAXTps
LBNAMAXTps
1 activity by having put on evidence of the sexual conduct in New
2 Mexico.
3 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor. And we, for the
4 reason --
5 THE COURT: I understand your point, which is whether
6 or not it violated New Mexico law, that witness, in her
7 telling, was under the age of consent in New York, and
8 therefore it goes to the conspiracy to -- the Mann Act
9 conspiracy count.
10 MR. ROHRBACH: Right, yes.
11 THE COURT: I get it.
12 I will absorb this information and propose -- I do
13 think a charge is necessary, but it has to be correct, and it
14 sounds like it may not be entirely correct as written. So I'll
15 propose.
16 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, if I could just be heard
17 briefly.
18 THE COURT: Sure.
19 MR. EVERDELL: On the point about not being illegal
20 under New Mexico law, this is really an eleventh-hour issue the
21 government is raising. They haven't charged it this way. I
22 imagine if they thought this was really a violation of New York
23 law there would be a substantive --
24 THE COURT: New Mexico law.
25 MR. EVERDELL: I'm sorry. I keep misstating, your
2 Mexico.
3 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor. And we, for the
4 reason --
5 THE COURT: I understand your point, which is whether
6 or not it violated New Mexico law, that witness, in her
7 telling, was under the age of consent in New York, and
8 therefore it goes to the conspiracy to -- the Mann Act
9 conspiracy count.
10 MR. ROHRBACH: Right, yes.
11 THE COURT: I get it.
12 I will absorb this information and propose -- I do
13 think a charge is necessary, but it has to be correct, and it
14 sounds like it may not be entirely correct as written. So I'll
15 propose.
16 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, if I could just be heard
17 briefly.
18 THE COURT: Sure.
19 MR. EVERDELL: On the point about not being illegal
20 under New Mexico law, this is really an eleventh-hour issue the
21 government is raising. They haven't charged it this way. I
22 imagine if they thought this was really a violation of New York
23 law there would be a substantive --
24 THE COURT: New Mexico law.
25 MR. EVERDELL: I'm sorry. I keep misstating, your
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00008347
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document